Some times when I play around with GHC I'd like to turn off dynamic linking
to make GHC compile faster. I'm not sure what the right way to do this in
build.mk. It's made confusing by the conditional statements in that file:
GhcLibWays = $(if $(filter $(DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS),YES),v dyn,v)
On 18/12/14 09:25, Phabricator wrote:
Harbormaster failed to build B2694: rGHC726ea08a6e58: Amend TcPluginM
interface!
Sigh. It seems perf/compiler T3294 is failing on Harbormaster, but it
validated fine locally on x86_64. I doubt my commit is responsible, and
suspect this is just a wobbly
File a Trac ticket!
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Carter
Schonwald
Sent: 18 December 2014 06:15
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: are patterns synonyms definable in GHCI?
Hey all,
I was trying to define some pattern synonyms in ghci recently, and that doesnt
| Thanks. That helps but I still don't understand why the calls are
| delegated to template-haskell library. Couldn't all of this be done
| locally?
No. If you have
f :: Int - Q Exp
then f is a function that, when run, produces a data structure that is the
syntax tree (in the data
Sergei
Thank you for all these. I believe I have (finally) nailed them all!
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Sergei Trofimovich
| Sent: 09 September 2014 18:32
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Status updates
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Carter Schonwald wrote:
Hey all,I was trying to define some pattern synonyms in ghci recently, and that
doesnt
seem to work. Is that something slated to be fix in 7.10 or something?
I thought GHCi accepts things that would be valid in a 'do' section? So
e.g.
x = ()
But GHCi does support data type declarations
ghci data T = A | B
so presumably it ought also to support pattern synonym declarations.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Dr.
| ERDI Gergo
| Sent: 18 December 2014 10:52
|
ghci also accepts a number of other things.
You can define data types, type synonyms, classes, instances, so pattern
synonyms would seem to fall into scope.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Dr. ERDI Gergo ge...@erdi.hu wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Carter Schonwald wrote:
Hey all,I was trying
On 18/12/14 12:51, Dr. ERDI Gergo wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Carter Schonwald wrote:
Hey all,I was trying to define some pattern synonyms in ghci recently,
and that doesnt
seem to work. Is that something slated to be fix in 7.10 or something?
I thought GHCi accepts things that would be
Bump. Any decisions on this one? If not then I'll move that folder somewhere
else because it's
getting in the way.
Janek
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
I'd say just move it under utils/. We really need to organize the
top-folder more, but that's for another day.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl wrote:
Bump. Any decisions on this one? If not then I'll move that folder somewhere
else because it's
getting in
We recently got a new warning -fwarn-unticked-promoted-constructors (see #9778
and D534). This
warning is enabled with -Wall but I think that this is not a good idea. I
strongly propose to
remove it with -Wall.
Rationale:
1. I feel that ticks add unnecessary noise:
prDictOfPReprInstTyCon ::
For what it's worth, I don't have a strong feeling either way here.
Arguments in favor of keeping -fwarn-unticked-promoted-constructors in -Wall:
1. It's weird having GHC look in one namespace (types) and then look in
another (terms) only when the first one fails. In other scenarios, ambiguity
dont forget you can vote for more than one!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com
wrote:
Hi *,
Everyone has been working hard getting things ready for the branch/RC
later this week - and that's really appreciated! As always, GHC
wouldn't be what it is without
Austin Seipp wrote:
- This week, Austin managed to secure two sponsors for
GHC/Haskell.org. We've been given a wonderful set of ARM buildbots
(running in the cloud!) and a new, incredibly powerful POWER8 machine
to use (with over 170 hardware threads available, for scalability
testing).
15 matches
Mail list logo
