On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 AM Heinrich Apfelmus
wrote:
> Mark Lentczner wrote:
> > *tl;dr: We'd like to incorporate stack into Haskell Platform, and stop
> > shipping pre-built packages, so we banish cabal hell, and have a single
> > common way to 'get Haskell' that just works.*
> >
> > [..]
>
OK, so I won't lose sleep over it!
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Mateusz Kowalczyk
| Sent: 23 July 2015 09:07
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Testsuite: recenter haddock.base
| allocation nu
Mark Lentczner wrote:
*tl;dr: We'd like to incorporate stack into Haskell Platform, and stop
shipping pre-built packages, so we banish cabal hell, and have a single
common way to 'get Haskell' that just works.*
[..]
We think this plan solves many different community needs:
- We have a clear
On 07/22/2015 05:35 PM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> Could it be creeping up because Haddock is doing more than before? Ie not
> just because GHC is being bad?
>
> S
Yes, it very much could be. Haddock is a moving target so it's not too
weird that the numbers change. I want to say that the perf