Re: Improving the "Get Haskell Experience"

2015-07-23 Thread Michael Snoyman
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 AM Heinrich Apfelmus wrote: > Mark Lentczner wrote: > > *tl;dr: We'd like to incorporate stack into Haskell Platform, and stop > > shipping pre-built packages, so we banish cabal hell, and have a single > > common way to 'get Haskell' that just works.* > > > > [..] >

RE: [commit: ghc] master: Testsuite: recenter haddock.base allocation numbers (1b76997)

2015-07-23 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
OK, so I won't lose sleep over it! | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of | Mateusz Kowalczyk | Sent: 23 July 2015 09:07 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Testsuite: recenter haddock.base | allocation nu

Re: Improving the "Get Haskell Experience"

2015-07-23 Thread Heinrich Apfelmus
Mark Lentczner wrote: *tl;dr: We'd like to incorporate stack into Haskell Platform, and stop shipping pre-built packages, so we banish cabal hell, and have a single common way to 'get Haskell' that just works.* [..] We think this plan solves many different community needs: - We have a clear

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Testsuite: recenter haddock.base allocation numbers (1b76997)

2015-07-23 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 07/22/2015 05:35 PM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > Could it be creeping up because Haddock is doing more than before? Ie not > just because GHC is being bad? > > S Yes, it very much could be. Haddock is a moving target so it's not too weird that the numbers change. I want to say that the perf