Thanks for the suggestion. That flag doesn't appear to help. Still no
unfolding info.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> Does passing -fobject-code solve your problem?
>
> Edward
>
> Excerpts from Conal Elliott's message of 2016-01-17 22:18:49 -0800:
> >
Oh! I spoke too soon. Yes, that flag does seem to make unfoldings
available. Thanks! Now more experimentation. Thanks again!
-- Conal
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Conal Elliott wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. That flag doesn't appear to help. Still no
> unfolding
Does passing -fobject-code solve your problem?
Edward
Excerpts from Conal Elliott's message of 2016-01-17 22:18:49 -0800:
> Hi Brandon. Thanks for the reply. I’m not sure that it addresses what I was
> trying to ask. GHCi *does* invoke plugins and even reloads those plugins
> dynamically when
Is it possible to have GHC plugins get invoked from the ghci *REPL* (in
addition to loaded source modules)? I'm doing some monomorphization-based
transformation, and currently I write scads of trivial monomorphic
specialization definitions like
> sumt6 = sum :: Tree 6 Int -> Int
I'd instead love
Hi Brandon. Thanks for the reply. I’m not sure that it addresses what I was
trying to ask. GHCi *does* invoke plugins and even reloads those plugins
dynamically when their source code changes. So in this sense ghci does
enable optimization, even if it doesn’t perform much optimization on its
own.
Alan & Kim Zimmerman writes:
> At the moment there are issues with having multiple GHC API sessions
> in a single executable, which boil down to GHC having global
> variables.
>
> A quick grep over the GHC sources shows the following instances
>
>
When I posted the (attached) POST request to newticket, I got the
following error. It did correctly add the ticket to the
database. I've elided the form token from this.
Trac detected an internal error:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'
Here's the contents of
I'm developing a GHC plugin (using HERMIT), and I'd like to use ghci to
speed up development. I'm able to do so, except that my plugin critically
needs access to unfoldings, which appear to be unavailable in ghci. A
little experimenting with ghc shows me that "-O" is the key, but "-O" is
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Conal Elliott wrote:
> I'm developing a GHC plugin (using HERMIT), and I'd like to use ghci to
> speed up development. I'm able to do so, except that my plugin critically
> needs access to unfoldings, which appear to be unavailable in ghci. A
>
At the moment there are issues with having multiple GHC API sessions
in a single executable, which boil down to GHC having global
variables.
A quick grep over the GHC sources shows the following instances
compiler/ghci/Linker.hs:90:GLOBAL_VAR_M(v_PersistentLinkerState, ...
>From https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/RemoteGHCi:
"We can have multiple instances of a GHC Session on the GHC API, each
running TH and/or interpreted code. Right now this is not possible because
the linker's state is global."
Regards,
Bartosz
2016-01-17 14:49 GMT+00:00 Alan & Kim Zimmerman
Yes, but this solution is bypassing the problem by using remote execution.
My question is what could be done to make the remote execution
unnecessary, i.e addressing the "Right now" part.
Alan
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Bartosz Nitka wrote:
> From
Can we somehow force Phab to apply a patch against a base commit from which the
patch was created?
Current setting does not seem very useful - it will probably force me to rebase
my patches once a
week or so. That will be very painful.
Janek
Dnia piątek, 15 stycznia 2016, Thomas Miedema
13 matches
Mail list logo