Herbert Valerio Riedel writes:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> On 2017-11-18 at 11:09:28 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> But surely the timing for a full build from scratch is not the most
>> important thing to compare? In my work environment, full builds are
>> extremely rare; the common case is
Hmm, when seeing "-ghc-version" I first thought
why a new flag for querying the version of GHC?
But the flag has a different purpose!
I'd suggest to rename it to "-ghcversion-file" or similar.
Just my two cents...
Cheers,
Gabor
On 11/18/17, g...@git.haskell.org wrote:
> Repository : s
Hi Malcolm,
On 2017-11-18 at 11:09:28 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
[...]
> But surely the timing for a full build from scratch is not the most
> important thing to compare? In my work environment, full builds are
> extremely rare; the common case is an incremental build after pulling
> changes
On 17 Nov 2017, at 18:46, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes:
>
>> Urk! I expected Hadrian to be faster because it has more accurate
>> dependencies.
>>
> While this is just speculation, this might actually be one of the
> reasons why the no-op case is slower: in make