The problem with the API is it's complex and can break between ghc versions.
But --show-iface is even more fragile and prone to break between ghc
versions.
The history of the plugins package constitutes a record of both kinds of
pain.
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Saurabh Nanda
I _think_ I've found what I need from
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/8843a39b3c941b1908a8d839f52bc323f3b45081/compiler/iface/LoadIface.hs#L994-L1002
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Saurabh Nanda
wrote:
> > I would be cautious about using the ghc-api hi file interfaces;
> I would be cautious about using the ghc-api hi file interfaces; hi files
turn out to interact with a
> lot of low-level parts in complex ways (even to the extent that they're a
large part of why ghc
> can't parallelize builds itself and attempts to change that have mostly
failed).
Are you
GHC has a "--show-iface" option which pretty prints the ".hi" file. Not
> sure if it works for your use-case but it may be easier to parse the text
> displayed by this option.
>
>From https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/IfaceFiles
--
> This textual format is not
I would be cautious about using the ghc-api hi file interfaces; hi files
turn out to interact with a lot of low-level parts in complex ways (even to
the extent that they're a large part of why ghc can't parallelize builds
itself and attempts to change that have mostly failed).
But if you must do
Also, "-ddump-hi" dumps the same information at compile time.
-harendra
On 3 December 2017 at 01:50, Harendra Kumar
wrote:
> GHC has a "--show-iface" option which pretty prints the ".hi" file. Not
> sure if it works for your use-case but it may be easier to parse the
GHC has a "--show-iface" option which pretty prints the ".hi" file. Not
sure if it works for your use-case but it may be easier to parse the text
displayed by this option.
-harendra
On 2 December 2017 at 21:29, Saurabh Nanda wrote:
> (GHC newbie alert -- is this the
(GHC newbie alert -- is this the right mailing list for these kind of
questions?)
I"m writing some code to figure out all the instances of particular
type-classes and after exploring a lot of options (hlint, haskell-src-exts,
annotations, doctests, etc), I realized that the compiler had already