Thank you for a very clear explanation and the solution.
Best,
On 21 July 2018 at 08:03, Ryan Scott wrote:
> Presumably, you're compiling this program outside of a git repository,
> and so the Template Haskell splice $(gitHash) evaluates to "UNKNOWN"
> at compile time. Here is an even more
On 15 July 2018 at 20:07, Ben Gamari wrote:
>
> The GHC development team is pleased to announce the second alpha release
> leading up to GHC 8.6.1.
The following MVE uses the gitrev library (
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/gitrev ):
$ cat Test.hs
{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
module
On 9 July 2017 at 11:50, David Feuer <da...@well-typed.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 9, 2017 1:05:44 AM EDT Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
>> While testing this RC candidate on Agda we found a compilation error.
>>
>> The error was caused by an *unused* module which
Hi Ben,
On 7 July 2017 at 13:22, Ben Gamari wrote:
>
> I am pleased to at long last announce the third (and almost certainly
> last) release candidate of GHC 8.2.1. Binary and source distributions
> can be found at,
>
> https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.2.1-rc3/
Dear all,
I got directory 1.3.0.0 after installing GHC 8.0.2 RC2 (which hasn't
been announced) using:
$ git clone http://git.haskell.org/ghc.git
$ cd ghc
$ git checkout ghc-8.0.2-rc
$ git submodule update --init
$ perl boot
$ ./configure
$ make
$ make install
Will GHC 8.0.2 do a
Hi Dan,
FYI, cpphs has a (new) bug tracker in
https://github.com/malcolmwallace/cpphs/issues
Best,
On 9 June 2016 at 16:11, Dan Aloni wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> If we pass pathnames starting with more than one slash to '-include',
> cpphs generates invalid output. These
On 17 May 2016 at 11:54, Ben Gamari wrote:
> So after many attempts I was able to reproduce the issue seen by
> Andrés and Karel and believe I have merged a fix.
>
> Let me know how your builds go
I couldn't reproduce the issue using the latest source tarballs. Thanks!
--
2016-05-17 8:21 GMT-05:00 Ben Gamari :
>> I got the following error (on Linux):
>>
>> $ make
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lHSghc-boot-th-8.0.1
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[1]: *** [utils/ghc-pkg/dist/build/tmp/ghc-pkg] Error 1
>>
> Very interesting. This must
2016-05-17 8:15 GMT-05:00 Ben Gamari :
>> I got the following error (on Linux):
>>
>> $ make
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lHSghc-boot-th-8.0.1
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[1]: *** [utils/ghc-pkg/dist/build/tmp/ghc-pkg] Error 1
>>
> Can you confirm that the
On 17 May 2016 at 07:38, Ben Gamari wrote:
> tl;dr: We are giving this release another attempt. Cross your fingers
>and try building again.
>
> Hello GHC packagers,
>
> Thanks for your help in the last few days working through what were
> hopefully the last issues in
Hi,
On 19 March 2016 at 21:46, Reid Barton wrote:
> `extensions: StrictData` turns on the StrictData extension for all modules
> in the program. So every field of every data type defined in every module is
> made strict.
I was aware of it.
> Is that really what you wanted?
Hi,
I know this isn't a convenient issue report because the "test case"
isn't easily reproducible. Since I don't understand the issue, I don't
know how to create a smaller test case, sorry.
My OS is Ubuntu 12-04 (64 bits) and I'm using the following programs:
Agda master branch on commit
Dear all,
On 13 January 2016 at 10:43, Ben Gamari wrote:
> The GHC Team is very pleased to announce the first release candidate of
> the Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.0.1 release.
For compiling Agda we use the -fwarn-monomorphism-restriction option.
Using GHC 7.6.3, 7.8.4 and
On 13 January 2016 at 15:28, George Colpitts wrote:
> installs fine on mac but cabal install vector fails on primitive, looks to
> me like gmp library is not provided
>
> cabal install vector
> Resolving dependencies...
> Configuring primitive-0.6.1.0...
> Failed to
On 13 January 2016 at 10:43, Ben Gamari wrote:
> The GHC Team is very pleased to announce the first release candidate of
> the Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.0.1 release. Source and binary
> distributions as well as the newly revised users guide can be found at
>
>
2016-01-13 17:33 GMT-05:00 Ben Gamari :
> Due to unfortunate Cabal/GHC interactions, GHC 8.0 will require
> Cabal 0.23. These interface file issues should be cleared up by
> wiping your 8.0.1 package database, installing Cabal and cabal-install
> 0.23 (only available from the
On 2 December 2015 at 01:54, Jens Petersen wrote:
> On 29 November 2015 at 23:54, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> On that note, 7.10.3 is coming. At the moment I am blocked on getting a
>> Cabal release tagged but hopefully this will happen Real Soon Now(TM).
>
>
Hi,
On 29 July 2015 at 10:26, Ben Gamari b...@well-typed.com wrote:
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new bug-fix release of GHC,
7.10.2.
Thanks for the release!
FYI, there are various missing *.tar.xz files in the SHA256SUMS file in
http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/7.10.2/
Best
On 29 July 2015 at 11:28, Ben Gamari b...@well-typed.com wrote:
FYI, there are various missing *.tar.xz files in the SHA256SUMS file in
http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/7.10.2/
I suspect this may be due to the (Content Delivery Network (CDN) caches
being stale. Unfortunately this seems to
On 14 June 2015 at 19:16, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.10.2:
Since transformers is a GHC-include library, is there any particular
reason why GHC 7.10.2 RC1 didn't include the latest version of the
transformers library,
I want to emphasize that cpphs is actively maintained as it's pointed
out in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Proposal/NativeCp. The
Agda team has found some cpphs bugs which have been *quickly* fixed by
cpphs's author, Malcolm Wallace. Unfortunately I have not been able to
track down the
Hi Janek,
On 6 May 2015 at 14:55, Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl wrote:
Yes, and that's what gets me worried. I suppose the problem was somehow
related to my locale
settings although we were unable to track down the cause. I also recall
someone else reported
being affected by the same
On 14 April 2015 at 14:56, Ozgun Ataman ozata...@gmail.com wrote:
500 random type declarations were a modest 10-25% slower.
I don't think this is a modest percent by only adding type
declarations. Is it an expected behaviour?
--
Andrés
___
ghc-devs
Hi,
(I apologise for this off topic message)
From the discussion started in
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2014-June/005117.html, it
seems GHC HQ didn't choose Phabricator as bug tracker system because
migrating from Trac ...There's no real pressure to do so and it would
be tons of
24 matches
Mail list logo