Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-09-01 Thread Simon Marlow
On 04/08/2014 13:13, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang: Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good): Expectedhaddock.base(normal)

RE: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-04 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Of | Joachim Breitner | Sent: 01 August 2014 22:27 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used | (8df7fea) | | Hi, | | | Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: | Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular

RE: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-04 Thread Edward Z . Yang
: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used | (8df7fea) | | Hi, | | | Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: | Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would | increase allocation significantly. | I wonder whether it just pushed it over

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-04 Thread Austin Seipp
| -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of | Joachim Breitner | Sent: 01 August 2014 22:27 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used | (8df7fea) | | Hi, | | | Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-04 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang: Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good): Expectedhaddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10% Lower

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-04 Thread Edward Z . Yang
Yes, plain validate. Cheers, Edward Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of 2014-08-04 12:08:31 +0100: Hi, Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang: Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good): Expectedhaddock.base(normal)

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-02 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 23:27 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would increase allocation significantly. I wonder whether it just pushed it over the

Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

2014-08-01 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would increase allocation significantly. I wonder whether it just pushed it over the threshold. I’m confident it was not just that: ~/logs $ fgrep 'Deviation