On 04/08/2014 13:13, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal)
Of
| Joachim Breitner
| Sent: 01 August 2014 22:27
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used
| (8df7fea)
|
| Hi,
|
|
| Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
| Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular
: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used
| (8df7fea)
|
| Hi,
|
|
| Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
| Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would
| increase allocation significantly.
| I wonder whether it just pushed it over
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Joachim Breitner
| Sent: 01 August 2014 22:27
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used
| (8df7fea)
|
| Hi,
|
|
| Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
Lower
Yes, plain validate.
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of 2014-08-04 12:08:31 +0100:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal)
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 23:27 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would increase
allocation significantly.
I wonder whether it just pushed it over the
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would increase
allocation significantly.
I wonder whether it just pushed it over the threshold.
I’m confident it was not just that:
~/logs $ fgrep 'Deviation