On 2014-05-01, at 23:46, Edward Kmett ekm...@gmail.com wrote:
With the old custom linker we weren't able to get our custom MPFR linked in
properly on all platforms for use in ghci.
On Macs we ran into some rather interesting problems. We could get it to
work for actual executables, but ghci
wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard
on?
Do
take a moment to add a bullet
:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard
on?
Do
take a moment to add a bullet
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC
Status
Report
see
where we stand.
Cheers,
Simon
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc
:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of
the *GHC
Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/__ghc/wiki/Status/May14
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a
draft of
the *GHC
Status
Report
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed
:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC
Status Report
| for
| the HCAR*, here:
|
|
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/__ghc/wiki/Status/May14
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com__ wrote:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC
Status Report
| for
| the HCAR*, here:
|
|
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/__ghc/wiki/Status
, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been
...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com__ wrote:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC
Status Report
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Edward Kmett ekm...@gmail.com wrote:
I may have to dig to find an example, but when I last checked it seemed
that c++ libraries would load fine, but there was a problem with static
initializers not getting called, when loading from ghci, so if your c++
library
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com__ wrote:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of
the *GHC
Status Report
| for
| the HCAR*, here:
|
|
https
where we stand.
Cheers,
Simon
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki
, and then we'll
see
where we stand.
Cheers,
Simon
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org
...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com__ wrote:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC
Status Report
| for
| the HCAR*, here:
|
|
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac
:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status Report
| for
| the HCAR*, here:
|
| https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
|
| Have we missed out something you have been working hard on? Do
| take a moment to add a bullet
told us, there’s a draft of the *GHC Status
Report for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/__ghc/wiki/Status/May14
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard
, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status Report for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard
|
|
|
|
| On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
| simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
|
| As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status
Report
wrote:
As Austin has told us, there's a draft of the *GHC Status Report
for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard on? Do
take a moment to add a bullet in an appropriate
, there’s a draft of the GHC Status Report for the
HCAR, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard on? Do take a
moment to add a bullet in an appropriate place (it’s a wiki). I’d like to
be sure that we are giving credit
Added a few sentences about DWARF support - we should really aim to get
this done for 7.10.
Greetings,
Peter Wortmann
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Great, thanks Peter!
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Peter Wortmann sc...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
Added a few sentences about DWARF support - we should really aim to get
this done for 7.10.
Greetings,
Peter Wortmann
___
ghc-devs mailing list
...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there’s a draft of the *GHC Status Report for
the HCAR*, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard on? Do
take a moment to add a bullet in an appropriate
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:45:35 +0100, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com writes:
Dynamic linking has been a huge headache in GHC, and it's not clear
that it's an overall improvement compared with the static linker. Now
that 7.8 is out of the way, it's time to have a conversation about
to update https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/
ghc/wiki/DynamicGhcPrograms, and then we'll see where we stand.
Cheers,
Simon
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com mailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
As Austin has told us, there’s a draft of the *GHC Status Report
wrote:
As Austin has told us, there’s a draft of the GHC Status Report for the
HCAR, here:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/May14
Have we missed out something you have been working hard on? Do take a
moment to add a bullet in an appropriate place (it’s a wiki). I’d like
29 matches
Mail list logo
