See 3b23f680c2b1f80b693eb8896fb21e4bbf8edc7e
On 26 May 2017 at 13:32, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> I can try to strip then all out and see what happens.
>
> That’d be good! With a Note to explain why…
>
>
>
> We still need ctxt_prec, I think, to pass to the ordinary type
2:14
To: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: HsParTy
When I was working through the ppr to use HsParTy everywhere it was not clear
whether there were any usages that required maybeParen, so I left it in.
I can try to strip then all out and see what hap
When I was working through the ppr to use HsParTy everywhere it was not
clear whether there were any usages that required maybeParen, so I left it
in.
I can try to strip then all out and see what happens.
Alan
On 26 May 2017 at 10:54, Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com> wrote:
Alan
Do you know why HsTypes.ppr_mono_ty contains any uses of 'maybeParen'?
Shouldn't the parens all be put in by HsParTy?
I tripped over this when I mistakenly added what I thought were missing
maybeParen calls for HsAppTy and HsAppTys, but that was flagged as an error by
a test in tests