Or: how can I selectively re-enable it for in my
> validate.mk?
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Phyx
> *Sent:* 04 July 2016 13:05
> *To:* Erik de Castro Lopo ; ghc-devs <
> ghc-devs@haskell.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Linker.
Let’s re-enable it. Or: how can I selectively re-enable it for in my
validate.mk?
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Phyx
Sent: 04 July 2016 13:05
To: Erik de Castro Lopo ; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: Linker.c broken
There used to be a bug in the msys2 runtime which
Simon Marlow writes:
> If parallel tests now work on Windows, could it be enabled by default?
>
I seem to remember trying this last summer and ran into trouble. That
being said, it would be worth trying again. I've fired up another build;
we'll see how it goes.
Cheers,
- Ben
signature.asc
De
There used to be a bug in the msys2 runtime which made certain processes
hang on exit in a non deterministic way.
So the parallel runs was disabled. I was looking into it but haven't been
able to reproduce it at all in months now since either upgrading msys2 or
Windows (to Windows 10).
We have a
Phyx wrote:
> I can build and validate in about an hour myself using 9 jobs on a core i7.
> If I revert the change in the testsuite preventing parallel runs for
> Windows
Oh dear, why is that?
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
htt
If parallel tests now work on Windows, could it be enabled by default?
On 4 July 2016 at 12:48, Phyx wrote:
> I can build and validate in about an hour myself using 9 jobs on a core
> i7. If I revert the change in the testsuite preventing parallel runs for
> Windows.
>
> Tamar
>
> On Mon, Jul 4,
I can build and validate in about an hour myself using 9 jobs on a core i7.
If I revert the change in the testsuite preventing parallel runs for
Windows.
Tamar
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 12:26 Ben Gamari wrote:
> "Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
>
> > On 4 July 2016 at 12:36, Ben Gamari wrote:
> >> Sim
True. Worth a try asking them what limits they're willing to lift for
a high profile open source project like GHC, I think.
--
Mathieu Boespflug
Founder at http://tweag.io.
On 4 July 2016 at 13:26, Ben Gamari wrote:
> "Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
>
>> On 4 July 2016 at 12:36, Ben Gamari wrote:
"Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
> On 4 July 2016 at 12:36, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> Simon Marlow writes:
>>
>>> I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
>>> Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my laptop
>>> into Windows and not doing anything e
On 4 July 2016 at 12:36, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Simon Marlow writes:
>
>> I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
>> Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my laptop
>> into Windows and not doing anything else for several hours. We need some
>
Ben Gamari wrote:
> Indeed; and I think it would also be worthwhile also setting up at least
> a nightly build validating 32-bit Linux.
If its not integrated with the CI, I'm not sure how useful that is.
As you may remember I have a Jenkins instance. Once a day it polls git and
if there are new
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>
>> I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
>> Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my laptop
>> into Windows and not doing anything else for several hours.
>
> Even building as 32 bit wou
Simon Marlow writes:
> I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
> Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my laptop
> into Windows and not doing anything else for several hours. We need some
> CI support for Windows - Ben/Austin any thoughts
Simon Marlow wrote:
> It was actually intentional. The patch validated on Travis:
> https://travis-ci.org/simonmar/ghc/builds/141572355 and I didn't think it
> was worth having it reviewed (but if you want to review all linker patches
> I'd be happy to put them on Phabricator in the future).
I *
On 4 July 2016 at 09:45, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
> > Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my
> laptop
> > into Windows and not doing anything else for several hours.
>
Simon Marlow wrote:
> I will fix it, sorry about this. Unfortunately I can't really add a
> Windows validate into my workflow because it would mean rebooting my laptop
> into Windows and not doing anything else for several hours.
Even building as 32 bit would have shaken out a bug in the format
2 July 2016 01:02
> | To: ghc-devs
> | Subject: Re: Linker.c broken
> |
> | I'm guessing it's:
> |
> | commit 6377757918c1e7f63638d6f258cad8d5f02bb6a7
> | Author: Simon Marlow
> | Date: Wed Jun 29 21:50:18 2016 +0100
> |
> | Linker: som
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote:
> rts\Linker.c:1480:28: error:
>
> error: format '%ls' expects argument of type 'wchar_t *', but argument 3
> has type 'void *' [-Werror=format=]
>
> debugBelch("%p is in %" PATH_FMT, addr,
I get an error on code from this commit
That was it.
Simon M: would you care to fix? Or should I push a revert?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Edward Z. Yang
| Sent: 02 July 2016 01:02
| To: ghc-devs
| Subject: Re: Linker.c broken
|
| I'm gue
I'm guessing it's:
commit 6377757918c1e7f63638d6f258cad8d5f02bb6a7
Author: Simon Marlow
Date: Wed Jun 29 21:50:18 2016 +0100
Linker: some extra debugging / logging
which added ghci_find.
Edward
Excerpts from Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs's message of 2016-07-01 18:51:20
-0400:
> Aarg
Aargh! Windows is broken /again/. Some mess-up in Linker.c.
I have not yet tried reverting recent patches. Might someone fix please?
It’s really helpful to validate on Windows when making RTS changes.
Simon
rts\Linker.c: In function 'ghci_find':
rts\Linker.c:1482:52: error:
error: p
21 matches
Mail list logo
