Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-11 Thread Jan Stolarek
...@gmail.com [mailto:michael.snoy...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Snoyman *Sent:* 10 September 2013 05:28 *To:* Simon Peyton-Jones *Cc:* core-libraries-commit...@haskell.org; ghc-devs; Geoffrey Mainland; Jan Stolarek *Subject:* Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

RE: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
jan.stola...@p.lodz.plmailto:jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl | DW: ghc-devs ghc-devs@haskell.orgmailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org | Wysłane: poniedziałek, 9 wrzesień 2013 15:40:09 | Temat: Re: Alex and new Bool primops | | Perhaps the core libraries committee should reconsider their decision? | :) Backwards

Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Geoffrey Mainland
; Geoffrey Mainland; Jan Stolarek *Subject:* Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops I'll admit a fair amount of ignorance of the GHC build process. But wouldn't it be standard that any tool used in the GHC build process itself, and built by GHC itself, would

Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Jan Stolarek
jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com Wysłane: wtorek, 10 wrzesień 2013 9:53:07 Temat: RE: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops (Simon M: are you ok with updating Alex? You were the one of those who argued strongly for using the old names for the new primops