Sergei
Thank you for all these. I believe I have (finally) nailed them all!
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Sergei Trofimovich
| Sent: 09 September 2014 18:32
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Status updates
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2014, 08:34 -0500 schrieb Austin Seipp:
- I've merged the Applicative Monad patchset! Yay! Many thanks to
Nathan Howell for helping me out in the end there. Please let me know
if anything explodes horribly (I hope not).
Not horrible, but still, it breaks:
Yes, brainfart - sorry!
Herbert kept telling me to bump base's version number after that
change - so I did. But I accidentally broke part of the bootstrap
process in my haste.
Not AMP related, at least. :) A fix is incoming shortly.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Joachim Breitner
- Gabor has set up some build documentation for us based on HEAD,
hooray! See here - http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/ - I still need to fix
haskell.org/ghc to link to this properly (there may be other dead
links, please let me know).
It’s a blank page for me.
Should probably be
Nope, my bad again. The actual link is:
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/docs/
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Karel Gardas karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote:
- Gabor has set up some build documentation for us based on HEAD,
hooray! See here - http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/ - I still need to fix
not sure why, but in the build docs, the version numbers on the module
packages look... bonkers
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/docs/7.9.20140908/html/libraries/index.html
eg
GHC.PackageDb
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/docs/7.9.20140908/html/libraries/bin-package-db-0.0.0.0/GHC-PackageDb.html
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:34:03 -0500
Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
- Sergei spent some time filing bugs that we should fix in the
testsuite, because they fail --slow validate. I believe these are two
of them:
- https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9567
-
- I still think we should turn on --slow mode for our buildbots soon,
but this will cause noise. I'd really like some inputs on this - maybe
someone would like to help clean up the 'slow' vaildate failures?
Bonus points for this, since you don't even have to
That's a great goal, but
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:31:03 -0500
Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
Hi *,
Here are some status updates for the past week, which have been a bit light.
Woot! Great list!
- I still think we should turn on --slow mode for our buildbots soon,
but this will cause noise. I'd really
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
- I still think we should turn on --slow mode for our buildbots soon,
but this will cause noise. I'd really like some inputs on this - maybe
someone would like to help clean up the 'slow' vaildate failures?
Bonus points
2014-09-03 22:31 GMT+02:00 Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com:
- Gabor Pali I had a minor discussion this last week about fixing
nightly documentation snapshots. We've had complaints about this in
the past and the prior system totally disappeared, so it will be
really nice to fix this!
János
| Sent: 03 September 2014 21:48
| To: Austin Seipp
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Status updates
|
| 2014-09-03 22:31 GMT+02:00 Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com:
| - Gabor Pali I had a minor discussion this last week about fixing
| nightly documentation snapshots. We've had
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2014, 08:39 -0500 schrieb Austin Seipp:
- Phabricator now has significantly better build integration, as I'm
sure many of you have seen. It is less noisy (and doesn't email you as
much), has better logging support (that actually works), and it now
builds commits
Thanks, Bryan!
On a related note, and to drum up some excitement - we have another
new committer (two in one day): Sergei Trofimovich :]
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
Hey Austin –
It's very helpful and informative to know what you're up to.
2014-06-06 3:26 GMT+02:00 Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp:
I have one Mac Pro to build GHC. But it is behind a firewall.
Is this useful for this purpose?
If it can reach the server (haskell.inf.elte.hu) on port 4938 then you
are probably good to go. The other requirement would be to able to
run
| - 7.8.3 is looming, because we have a lot of bugfixes as I said last
| week: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-7.8.3
Just to be clear, on that page:
closed = done in 7.8.3 branch
patch = will go in 7.8.3 branch
new/infoneeded = will NOT go in 7.8.3 unless
Drats, I forgot that. Here's where it is:
Go to the GHC Trac hompeage: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ and
scroll down just a tiny bit. There's a section called 'Nightly builds'
with the updated link to the new UI, located on Gabor's server:
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/
Simon, did we
Hi,
- Also, if you have spare hardware, please email Gabor Pali (or just
email the list itself, or reply to this thread) if you're willing to
donate, that would be awesome. Another Mac OS X target would be
especially welcome, I think (my development machine is on loan right
now), and I will
I can build on my Mac. Happy to do so since I'll be doing anyways :-)
On Thursday, June 5, 2014, Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
Hi,
- Also, if you have spare hardware, please email Gabor Pali (or just
email the list itself, or reply to this thread) if you're willing to
donate,
Austin,
Could we please make sure to include this bug for 7.8.3?
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9078
The ticket already includes a patch that solves the problem for us.
As remarked by Levent, this bug will probably affect all EDSL that use Andy’s
StableName-based observable sharing
Hi Austin,
Could you consider #9012 for 7.8.3?
* Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com [2014-05-05 11:54:20-0500]
Hi all,
- The HCAR entry was quickly completed last week thanks to everyone,
much appreciated for the quick response! And it made me aware of some
other new things in the
On 2014-04-22 at 14:42:46 +0200, Austin Seipp wrote:
[...]
- I've been looking into our CI setup for GHC, and evaluating things.
Right now though, I am directly working on getting Windows build bots
set up on Gabor's infrastructure. He gave me the credentials, and
hopefully this should not
| having GHC HQ monitor breakage in (a subset) of hackage for HEAD would
| be great! I can imagine a daily (or weekly, depending on resources)
| build of all of hackage or stackage using HEAD, and when there is a
| breakage, then git bisect on our soon bisectable repo and a tool that
| would allow
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 24.04.2014, 08:29 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
Please remember that ghc hq = Austin and me.
sorry, I meant and should have said, more generally, GHC developers.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
m...@joachim-breitner.de •
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
So we increasingly rely on the army of GHC volunteers to do the heavy
lifting. I'm increasingly encouraging Austin to see his role as
supporting,
encouraging,
helping,
coordinating,
removing
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.04.2014, 07:42 -0500 schrieb Austin Seipp:
- I've been looking into our CI setup for GHC, and evaluating things.
Right now though, I am directly working on getting Windows build bots
set up on Gabor's infrastructure. He gave me the credentials, and
hopefully this
26 matches
Mail list logo
