Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi, just came here to resurrect the thread and point out that nofib currently isn't really run in parallel: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15976#ticket Also it's unclear to me how that would be possible without rewriting the whole benchmark harness in Python or Haskell, because make

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 29.10.2017, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Graf: > Hi, > > just wanted to throw in the idea of parallelising the benchmark suite > (hurts to even write that, but cachegrind) to speed up the build, if > ever need be.

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi, just wanted to throw in the idea of parallelising the benchmark suite (hurts to even write that, but cachegrind) to speed up the build, if ever need be. Cheers, Sebastian On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty < c...@justtesting.org> wrote: > Am 24.10.2017 um 14:46 schrieb

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

> Am 24.10.2017 um 14:46 schrieb Joachim Breitner >: > > Is CircleCI the future now? Yes, as per https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ContinuousIntegration > In

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi Joachim, > But that’s what I am saying: By measuring dynamic instructions (using > cachegrind), the execution time is no longer relevant. I'm skeptical that this metric is a reliable enough proxy for actual runtime of user programs to make tracking it and only it sufficient. For the reasons

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi, Is CircleCI the future now? In general, yes. But it’s running fine for now, so I would not prematurely throw it over. My requirements are: * needs to run on every commit (not just every push), including branches. * needs to be able to push to a repository¹, so it needs access to

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hi Joachim, Great! Just because you mention CI infrastructure and our effort around GHC CI at the moment, do you think, it would make sense to move this to CircleCI eventually? Cheers, Manuel > Am 24.10.2017 um 11:02 schrieb Joachim Breitner : > > Hi, > > after a

Re: perf.haskell.org functional again

Hooray! Thanks for doing this! Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Oct 2017, at 8:02 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Hi, > > after a system upgrade to avoid weird linker errors, and after some fixes in > the nofib submodule, http://perf.haskell.org/ghc is running again. >