On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, at 10:20, Elliot Cameron wrote:
> The only loss is the ability to look at changes over time.
GHC docs are archived for every version number:
https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc//...
So it would remain possible to compare the changes between each release.
The only problem
> | Sent: 14 March 2017 00:14
> | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: Removing core-spec.pdf from repository?
> |
> | > I also dislike generated files in repos, but would like to point out
> | > that there are a few pages out there that reference the link
> | >
00:14
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Removing core-spec.pdf from repository?
|
| > I also dislike generated files in repos, but would like to point out
| > that there are a few pages out there that reference the link
| > https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/docs/core-
Hi devs,
How about putting it here every release? :
https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/latest/docs/html/ or
https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/latest/docs/
`core-spec.pdf` will be helpful.
But generating it in Windows is a bit complicated :)
Regards,
Takenobu
2017-03-14 7:57 GMT+09:00
That would be a neat solution - I'd second that...
On 14/03/17 11:13, Phil Ruffwind wrote:
I also dislike generated files in repos, but would like to point out
that there are a few pages out there that reference the link
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/docs/core-spec/core-spec.pdf
Certainly no complaints from me. I knew I was doing a Bad Thing when I
committed that file, but couldn't think of a good alternative, given the rarity
of finding an ott installation.
Thanks, Ben.
Richard
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>
> Hello
> I also dislike generated files in repos, but would like to point out
> that there are a few pages out there that reference the link
> https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/docs/core-spec/core-spec.pdf
> directly; these would brake. But there is probably nothing we can
> easily do about that.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.03.2017, 18:57 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> I suggest that we remove the PDF from the repository but instead I can
> start including it in my nightly documentation builds. Any objections?
I also dislike generated files in repos, but would like to point out
that there are a
;ghc-devs@haskell.org>
Subject: Removing core-spec.pdf from repository?
Hello everyone,
Currently there is a typeset copy of the Core specification in the GHC
repository. This means any time someone changes the specification the
repository grows by around 300kB. While this isn't the end of the
Hello everyone,
Currently there is a typeset copy of the Core specification in the GHC
repository. This means any time someone changes the specification the
repository grows by around 300kB. While this isn't the end of the
world, it's generally considered bad form to put generated files under
10 matches
Mail list logo