Re: Status of Harbormaster

Erik de Castro Lopo writes: > Ben Gamari wrote: > >> It's a bit unclear how far we should extend test coverage. In the future >> I think I will at very least add an i386 Ubuntu environment, but we >> could go farther still. For instance these platforms immediately come to

Re: Status of Harbormaster

On 10/ 4/16 09:18 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: * AArch64 Linux That would be awesome if we could get access to a decent (by which I mean server grade, with at least 4 cores and 8 Gig of RAM). Just ask for account on GNU GCC Compile Farm. They do have X-gene V1 machine in the farm,

Re: Status of Harbormaster

Ben Gamari wrote: > It's a bit unclear how far we should extend test coverage. In the future > I think I will at very least add an i386 Ubuntu environment, but we > could go farther still. For instance these platforms immediately come to > mind, > > * x86_64 FreeBSD > * x86_64 Solaris > * ARM

Status of Harbormaster

Hello everyone, Over the last few weeks I have been gradually pushing away at increasing our Harbormaster coverage. I'm happy to report that Harbormaster should now test commits on, * x86_64 Ubuntu Linux * x86_64 Mac OS X Sierra * x86_64 Windows (although the bugs are still being worked out

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Richard Eisenberg writes: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for tackling this difficult issue -- I know you've been looking > for a better solution. > > As I understand it, anyone will now need to add a public key to Phab > in order to upload patches. This (as you admit) will increase

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Hi Ben, Thanks for tackling this difficult issue -- I know you've been looking for a better solution. As I understand it, anyone will now need to add a public key to Phab in order to upload patches. This (as you admit) will increase the barriers to contributions. Are the instructions for how

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Ben Gamari writes: > tl;dr. I am working on restoring Harbormaster support for Differentials. >Towards this end, GHC's Phabricator instance will soon require >that you add an SSH public key to your account in order to upload >patches with `arc diff`.

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Ben Gamari writes: > Joachim Breitner writes: > >> Hi, >> ... > Ahh, sure. Right, it's expected that ssh requires a key. Indeed http is > more fitting for your bot. > >> I’ll wait for the CDN to get working. >> > I'll let you know when things

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Joachim Breitner writes: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 29.08.2016, 10:03 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: >> >> Regardless, you should be able to clone the repo via ssh. > > Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > >

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Hi, Am Montag, den 29.08.2016, 10:03 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > > it does not seem to be world-readable: > > > > $ git fetch phab > > fatal: unable to access 'http://phabricator.haskell.org/diffusion/G > > HCDIFF/GHC-Differentials.git/': The requested URL returned error: > > 500 > > >

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Joachim Breitner writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 26.08.2016, 17:39 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: >> Indeed, it's available at [1]. > > it does not seem to be world-readable: > > $ git fetch phab > fatal: unable to access >

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Phyx writes: > Hi Ben, > > Out of curiosity which platforms will be getting harbormaster support? Is > this only Linux x86_64? > > Any plans to expand this in the future to all Tier 1 platforms? > Indeed I would like to get to this point. At the moment I am focusing on Linux

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Hi, Am Freitag, den 26.08.2016, 17:39 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: > Indeed, it's available at [1]. it does not seem to be world-readable: $ git fetch phab fatal: unable to access 'http://phabricator.haskell.org/diffusion/GHCDIFF/GHC-Differentials.git/': The requested URL returned error: 500 >

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Hi Ben, Out of curiosity which platforms will be getting harbormaster support? Is this only Linux x86_64? Any plans to expand this in the future to all Tier 1 platforms? Cheers, Tamar On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, 22:39 Ben Gamari wrote: > Joachim Breitner

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Joachim Breitner writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 26.08.2016, 09:38 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: >> The reason for this new requirement is that `arc diff` will soon push >> submitted diffs to a "staging area", a Git repository managed by >>

Re: Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

Hi, Am Freitag, den 26.08.2016, 09:38 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: > The reason for this new requirement is that `arc diff` will soon push > submitted diffs to a "staging area", a Git repository managed by > Phabricator containing a branch for each submitted Differential. this is great, because it

Action Required: Status of Harbormaster for Differentials

tl;dr. I am working on restoring Harbormaster support for Differentials. Towards this end, GHC's Phabricator instance will soon require that you add an SSH public key to your account in order to upload patches with `arc diff`. Hello everyone, As you are no doubt aware