Hi Alex,
You're deleting hacks that were added for ancient version of binutils
(added in 14a5aadb84c34dbe2bee129ed80fdfa1fb12e3e0 in 2005
and b8a64b8ec9cd3d8f6e3f23e44312c4903eccac45 in 2007).
I think that if you submit your patch without a test, there's a good chance
it will get accepted.
Thoma
I am not sure if this will work, but how about dumping the assembly and
looking for sign extension? C-- might be easier!
Excerpts from Alex Dzyoba's message of 2016-07-09 08:25:39 -0400:
> Hi, all!
>
> I was working on #11758, which is about dropping binutils<2.17 hack, and while
> it was relati
Hi, all!
I was working on #11758, which is about dropping binutils<2.17 hack, and while
it was relatively easy to remove the hack itself, I'm not sure how to add a
test case for it.
As I understand, after removing the aforementioned hack, native codegen now
shouldn't generate sign extension. So m
