rg
| Subject: Re: Trees that Grow in the hsSyn AST
|
| On Friday, May 26, 2017 9:03:15 AM EDT Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
| > 1. Which is better to start with: HsSyn or Core? Intuition suggests
| this sort of thing could be very helpful for making zapping more reliable
| and ensuring its effici
On Friday, May 26, 2017 9:03:15 AM EDT Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> 1. Which is better to start with: HsSyn or Core? Intuition suggests this sort
> of thing could be very helpful for making zapping more reliable and ensuring
> its efficiency, but there may be better reasons to start with HsSyn.
>
Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>; Alan & Kim Zimmerman
<alan.z...@gmail.com>; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: RE: Trees that Grow in the hsSyn AST
I haven't looked in detail yet, but there seem to be good ideas. I have two
questions:
1. Which is better to start with: HsSyn or
ation
> (unbound, bound, abt, etc)?
>
>
> David Feuer
> Well-Typed, LLP
>
> Original message
> From: Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org>
> Date: 5/25/17 6:48 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Alan & Kim Zimmerman <alan.
ghc-devs@haskell.org> Date: 5/25/17 6:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Alan & Kim
Zimmerman <alan.z...@gmail.com>, ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: RE: Trees that
Grow in the hsSyn AST
Folks
Do take a look at this:
· We propose to re-engineer HsSyn itself. This will tou
and Shayan can record the answers in the wiki.
I’m inclined to go ahead with this, so yell soon if you disagree.
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Alan & Kim
Zimmerman
Sent: 24 May 2017 22:52
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Trees that Grow in the hsSyn AST
Hi
Hi all
You may be aware that Shayan Najd presented the paper "Trees that Grow"[1]
at HIW last year.
Based on the following mandate
> As in my previous email to Shayan (attached). Wiki page, describe goals,
design,
> approach. Point to prototype implementation. Seek comments. You can
say
