RE: Getting exceptions right

I have elaborated a bit. Can you go further to a clear set of proposals? | -Original Message- | From: David Feuer [mailto:da...@well-typed.com] | Sent: 07 March 2017 18:35 | To: Simon Peyton Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Getting exceptions right | |

Re: Windows build broken again

https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13375 On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, 08:05 David Macek, wrote: > On 4. 3. 2017 22:01, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote: > > Exception: stderr from command: > ['"/c/code/HEAD/inplace/bin/ghc-pkg.exe"', 'dump'] > > Pinpointing the

Re: Windows build broken again

On 4. 3. 2017 22:01, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote: > Exception: stderr from command: ['"/c/code/HEAD/inplace/bin/ghc-pkg.exe"', > 'dump'] Pinpointing the failure. I guess `ghc-pkg dump` is not supposed to write to stderr, but it does. Unfortunately, the test driver doesn't seem to tell

Re: Better perf

Hi, perf.haskell.org has something to say about these: Am Montag, den 06.03.2017, 15:45 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs: > I’ve just committed this patch sequence > fb9ae288088a3eabc4e1bb4e86fa473a3881d2e2 Make FloatOut/SetLevels idemoptent > on bottoming functions increases

Re: Travis again over time

Hi, ok, one of these patches brought the build time on Travis down to very nice 1h again: https://github.com/ghc/ghc/compare/749740f9c3cb...8ca4bb1ce9d9 The build would be marked as passing if it were not for integerConstantFolding which is marked as test('integerConstantFolding',  

RE: Better perf

| But: binary-trees runtime increases by 5%. David: might you look to see if there is any obvious reason for this regression? We could just accept it, but it's always good to know why, and to document it. Thanks Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs

RE: Windows build broken again

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > Windows build still broken. Please please could someone fix? > It's something to do with the testsuite Python script This is #13375. I have a fix in D3289. It's currently validating. Cheers, - Ben signature.asc Description:

Re: Windows build broken again

Phyx writes: > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13375 > Are people not receiving my messages pointing out this ticket? I've mentioned it twice now but I get the impression that these messages aren't being seen. Cheers, - Ben signature.asc Description: PGP

RE: Windows build broken again

This last email was the first one I’ve received from you. From: Ben Gamari Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 18:50 To: Phyx; David Macek; simo...@microsoft.com; ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Re: Windows build broken again Phyx writes: >

Re: Windows build broken again

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > The Windows build is broken again. Here's the tail of the log > Yes, I opened a ticket (#13375) about this earlier. Running, "C:/msys64/home/ben/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-pkg.exe" recache is sufficient to work around the issue it

Getting exceptions right

I've put together a wiki page describing the issues I think we need to address, and laying out the model I think we want to implement for precise exceptions. Hopefully, this will help us figure out what we need to do to get a better story here.

Re: Better perf

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I've just committed this patch sequence > > fb9ae288088a3eabc4e1bb4e86fa473a3881d2e2 Make FloatOut/SetLevels idemoptent > on bottoming functions > > 995ab74b3c55fe3a0299bd94b49e948c942e76d6 Comments only > >