Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.06.2018, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> How about on a new page (e.g. Building/InGhci) linked to from,
>
> * https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building
> * https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions (in the Tips
>& Tricks section)
>
> It
On 7 June 2018 at 22:25, Evan Laforge wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > For loading large amounts of code into GHCi, you want to add -j +RTS
> > -A128m where is the number of cores on your machine. We've found that
> > parallel compilation works really well in
On 8 June 2018 at 00:33, Evan Laforge wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Bartosz Nitka wrote:
> > What version of GHC are you using?
> > There have been some significant improvements like
> > https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHCb8fec6950ad99cbf11cd22698b
> 8d5ab35afb828f,
> > that only
On 8 June 2018 at 19:18, Evan Laforge wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > heap profiler for a while. However, I imagine at some point loading
> > everything into GHCi will become unsustainable and we'll have to explore
> > other strategies. There are a couple of
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> heap profiler for a while. However, I imagine at some point loading
> everything into GHCi will become unsustainable and we'll have to explore
> other strategies. There are a couple of options here:
> - pre-compile modules so that GHCi is
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised that it keeps breaking for you, given that this is a
> core feature of GHCi and we have multiple tests for it. You'll need to
> remind me - what were the bugs specifically? Maybe we need more tests.
Most recently, 8.2
