Hi Austin,
I apologize for not having read the full email yet (I'm in a hurry right
now), but...
* Austin Seipp ase...@pobox.com [2013-06-09 00:23:22-0500]
-- Let's just put base and testsuite inside the GHC repository
directly. No submodules, no floating repos. Just put it directly
inside
Hello all,
I recently posted a bug report about cabal that's exposed by its interaction
with GHC HEAD, and one of the cabal devs reasonably asked about a snapshot of
HEAD somewhere. The link from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download leads to an
empty directory. Is there another place I can
Hi Roman,
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
I'm a strong -1 on this. As one example, we have forks of base and
ghc-prim for Haskell suite:
https://github.com/haskell-suite/base
https://github.com/haskell-suite/ghc-prim
which would be much more
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl wrote:
I admire your talent for writing emails ;-)
You can be honest and just call them what they are: horribly written novellas.
As you wrote in your email I'm totally for including testsuite into GHC,
because it is
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:15:37AM -0500, Austin Seipp wrote:
I'm referring to Joachim Breitner's work on
splitting the base.
So what's the timeline here?
As soon as possible after 7.8 is branched.
Thanks
Ian
___
ghc-devs mailing list
You can be honest and just call them what they are: horribly written
novellas.
Actually, I was thinking that instead of posting to the list you might consider
publishing your
emails as papers on workshops or symposia ;)
for high-traffic repositories, some of the concerns are disconcerning.
Oh, and I've been made aware that git 1.7 and later can checkout a subdirectory
of a repo - this
partially invalidates my previous argument. I'm saying partially, because it is
a bit more
difficult than dealing with a library that has its own repo + it seems that
some potential
contributors
* Austin Seipp ase...@pobox.com [2013-06-09 11:15:37-0500]
Hi Roman,
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
I'm a strong -1 on this. As one example, we have forks of base and
ghc-prim for Haskell suite:
https://github.com/haskell-suite/base
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
What I'm trying to say here is that there's hope for a portable base.
Maybe not in the form of split base — I don't know.
But it's the direction we should be moving anyways.
And usurping base by GHC is a move in the
* John Lato jwl...@gmail.com [2013-06-10 07:59:55+0800]
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
What I'm trying to say here is that there's hope for a portable base.
Maybe not in the form of split base — I don't know.
But it's the direction we should be
10 matches
Mail list logo
