Simon Marlow writes:
> This sounds right to me. Did you submit a patch?
>
Not yet, I'm currently fighting through some build system issues which
are preventing me from actually installing and testing the compiler on
my ARM box.
> Note that dynamic linking with LLVM is likely to produce signific
On 20/12/13 12:45, Dr. ERDI Gergo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started looking at adding pattern synonym support to Haddock (as part
> of #5144), but I've realized that pattern synonyms are different enough
> from other, existing declarations that are processed by Haddock that I'd
> like to discuss it
Hi,
I've started looking at adding pattern synonym support to Haddock (as part
of #5144), but I've realized that pattern synonyms are different enough
from other, existing declarations that are processed by Haddock that I'd
like to discuss it first. Who would be 'the Haddock guy' to talk to?
This sounds right to me. Did you submit a patch?
Note that dynamic linking with LLVM is likely to produce significantly
worse code that with the NCG right now, because the LLVM back end uses
dynamic references even for symbols in the same package, whereas the NCG
back-end uses direct static r
