Re: GHC and LLVM

Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > That sounds great. Can your Jenkins instance maybe also push > the reports to one of the GHC lists, so everybody can see what > the state of play is? Well currently the report log is 7Meg and I'm sure everyone would appreciate it if I kept those to myself.

Re: Applicative Comprehensions

On 12/10/2015 09:09, David A Roberts wrote: Hi, I raised this question on #haskell, and was advised that this was probably the best place to discuss. I see that Applicative Do is scheduled for GHC 8.0 [1], and was hoping that this might also enable support for Applicative Comprehensions [2].

Re: Applicative Comprehensions

There was a feature request made for this on Trac before ApplicativeDo was finished (https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8914), so generalizing monad comprehensions would fix half of Trac #8914. (The other half, which proposes generalizing ParallelListComp, would require an API change, so it

Fwd: Strictness/demand analysis without worker/wrapper, or, reviving -fmax-worker-args

Forgot to also send to the list > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Christiaan Baaij > Subject: Re: Strictness/demand analysis without worker/wrapper, or, reviving > -fmax-worker-args > Date: 15 Oct 2015 17:27:21 CEST > To: Simon Peyton Jones

Re: Applicative Comprehensions

Simon: Thanks, that would be great. I've opened #10976 < https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10976> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 at 22:16 Ryan Scott wrote: > There was a feature request made for this on Trac before ApplicativeDo was > finished

Re: Request to reopen the issue of 7.8 on El Capitan

I can build a 7.8.5 binary for release if someone can put the patch in the GHC tree. (Having a soft spot in my heart for the 7.8 line!) I'm leaving on a short trip, and will be back on Tuesday and build middle of next week. ​ - Mark ___ ghc-devs mailing