Ah okay, thanks!
On Oct 11, 2016 8:25 PM, "Ömer Sinan Ağacan" wrote:
> > Is it not possible to unit test GHC?
>
> You need to export functions you want to test, and then write a program
> that
> tests those functions using the `ghc` package.
>
> See
>
> Is it not possible to unit test GHC?
You need to export functions you want to test, and then write a program that
tests those functions using the `ghc` package.
See
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/testsuite/tests/unboxedsums/unboxedsums_unit_tests.hs
for an example.
2016-10-11 17:50
I read somewhere that fixing the graph register allocator would be a
good project so I thought I'd look into it. I couldn't find any tickets
about it on Trac though so I was poking around for tests to see what (if
anything) was wrong with it.
After I sent that last email I googled around for
Thomas Jakway writes:
> Can anyone point me to the register allocator tests (especially for the
> graph register allocator)? Can't seem to find them and grepping doesn't
> turn up much (pretty much just
> testsuite/tests/codeGen/should_run/cgrun028.h).
>
What sort of tests
Hello,
There may be some more thinking to be done on the design of this feature.
In particular, if a module `M` has en export declaration `module T`, this
is not at all the same as adding `import T` in modules exporting `M`. The
reason is that meaning of `module T` depends on what is in scope in
Hello,
I'm attempting to add support for export of qualified modules (feature
request #8043), and any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Namely I'm
very familiar with languages / grammars / happy and was easily able to add
an appropriate production alternative to Parser.y to construct a new
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Carter Schonwald <
carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you elaborate or point me to where this philosophy is articulated in
> commentary in base or in the language standards ?
Could you elaborate or point me to where this philosophy is articulated in
commentary in base or in the language standards ?
On Monday, October 10, 2016, David Feuer wrote:
> It may currently be true for floats, but it's never been true in general,
> particularly with