Hi
Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days ago and it is not clear
who has the next action.
Thanks
George
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:43 AM Ben Gamari wrote:
> Hello GHCers,
>
> Thanks to the work of darchon the last blocker for the 8.0.2 release
> (#12479) has
Jan Stolarek writes:
>> I don't entirely agree. I personally find it very hard to review large
>> patches as the amount of mental context generally seems to grow
>> super-linearly in the amount of code touched. Moreover, I think it's
>> important to remember that the need
> I don't entirely agree. I personally find it very hard to review large
> patches as the amount of mental context generally seems to grow
> super-linearly in the amount of code touched. Moreover, I think it's
> important to remember that the need to read patches does not vanish the
> moment the
Jan Stolarek writes:
>> (did you intend to send two identical links?)
> No :-) The branches should be js-hoopl-cleanup-v1 and js-hoopl-cleanup-v2
>
>> Yes, the end result would be the same - I'm merely asking what would be
>> preferred by GHC devs (i.e., I don't know how
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2016, 10:20 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes:
>
> > I’m getting this on HEAD on my Linux box (64 bit)
> >
> > cd "./perf/T10858.run" && "/5playpen/simonpj/HEAD-2/inplace/test
> > spaces/ghc-stage2" -c
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes:
> I’m getting this on HEAD on my Linux box (64 bit)
>
> cd "./perf/T10858.run" && "/5playpen/simonpj/HEAD-2/inplace/test
> spaces/ghc-stage2" -c T10858.hs -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -no-user-package-db
> -rtsopts