Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-20 Thread George Colpitts
Hi Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days ago and it is not clear who has the next action. Thanks George On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:43 AM Ben Gamari wrote: > Hello GHCers, > > Thanks to the work of darchon the last blocker for the 8.0.2 release > (#12479) has

Re: Dataflow analysis for Cmm

2016-10-20 Thread Ben Gamari
Jan Stolarek writes: >> I don't entirely agree. I personally find it very hard to review large >> patches as the amount of mental context generally seems to grow >> super-linearly in the amount of code touched. Moreover, I think it's >> important to remember that the need

Re: Dataflow analysis for Cmm

2016-10-20 Thread Jan Stolarek
> I don't entirely agree. I personally find it very hard to review large > patches as the amount of mental context generally seems to grow > super-linearly in the amount of code touched. Moreover, I think it's > important to remember that the need to read patches does not vanish the > moment the

Re: Dataflow analysis for Cmm

2016-10-20 Thread Ben Gamari
Jan Stolarek writes: >> (did you intend to send two identical links?) > No :-) The branches should be js-hoopl-cleanup-v1 and js-hoopl-cleanup-v2 > >> Yes, the end result would be the same - I'm merely asking what would be >> preferred by GHC devs (i.e., I don't know how

Re: Perf on T10858

2016-10-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2016, 10:20 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > > > I’m getting this on HEAD on my Linux box (64 bit) > > > > cd "./perf/T10858.run" &&  "/5playpen/simonpj/HEAD-2/inplace/test    > > spaces/ghc-stage2" -c

Re: Perf on T10858

2016-10-20 Thread Ben Gamari
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I’m getting this on HEAD on my Linux box (64 bit) > > cd "./perf/T10858.run" && "/5playpen/simonpj/HEAD-2/inplace/test > spaces/ghc-stage2" -c T10858.hs -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -no-user-package-db > -rtsopts