Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

Ok many thanks for the heads up Ben. I'll let Facundo coordinate from here, regarding #12777. -- Mathieu Boespflug Founder at http://tweag.io. On 14 November 2016 at 23:28, Ben Gamari wrote: > "Boespflug, Mathieu" writes: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > still a few

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

"Boespflug, Mathieu" writes: > Hi Ben, > > still a few tickets, most of them with patches, slated for the 8.0.2 > milestone: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-8.0.2. Is the > plan still to merge those in? > There was one patch that was mistakenly in patch state

OSX build failing

Hi all, The OSX build is broken due to 55d535da10dd63bbaf03fb176ced7179087cd0d4 Should I revert the patch or is there a fix coming? Matt = commit 55d535da10dd63bbaf03fb176ced7179087cd0d4 Author: Simon Marlow Date: Wed Nov 9 09:20:02 2016 + Remove

Re: OSX build failing

I now see D2705, sorry for the noise. Matt On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Matthew Pickering wrote: > Hi all, > > The OSX build is broken due to 55d535da10dd63bbaf03fb176ced7179087cd0d4 > > Should I revert the patch or is there a fix coming? > > Matt > > = > >

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

Hi Ben, still a few tickets, most of them with patches, slated for the 8.0.2 milestone: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-8.0.2. Is the plan still to merge those in? https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12777 is particularly important for inline-java. Many thanks, -- Mathieu

Re: Non-working "-no-pie" test?

Gabor Greif writes: > Hi all, > > The test for checking "-no-pie" support of GCC doesn't seem to work. See > below: > > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for

Non-working "-no-pie" test?

Hi all, The test for checking "-no-pie" support of GCC doesn't seem to work. See below: $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for

Re: T12041 failing?

Ok, so I think we should mark the test as expect_broken, because the Travis builds use -DDEBUG and this is causing them to fail currently (see e.g. https://travis-ci.org/simonmar/ghc/builds/174768018) Cheers Simon On 11 November 2016 at 17:39, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: >

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

Yitzchak Gale writes: > Ben, I see #12757 is now fixed and closed. Great! > > What's the prognosis now for a release? > I'm just waiting for a release of filepath and then one more round of tests and then I should have a source release ready. This release has been a bit of a

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

Ben, I see #12757 is now fixed and closed. Great! What's the prognosis now for a release? Thanks, Yitz On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Ben Gamari wrote: > George Colpitts writes: > >> Hi >> >> Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days