On 26 November 2016 at 07:38, Ben Gamari wrote:
> http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.0.2-rc1/
>
Thank you, I built it for Fedora 25 (just released last week) and Rawhide:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.0.2
Hopefully there will be a build for
On 28 November 2016 at 16:37, Jens Petersen wrote:
> I think it is not being generated.
>
Well it might be generated, but it is not getting installed properly by
default anyway.
Looks like a buildsystem regression to me wrt to 8.0.1: I guess we should
> file a bug...
>
On 26 November 2016 at 22:46, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 docs/users_guide/build-man/ghc.1
> > "/usr/local/share/man/man1"
> > install: /usr/local/share/man/man1/ghc.1: No such file or directory
> > make[1]: *** [install_man] Error 71
> > make: ***
> On Nov 27, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Michal Terepeta
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m trying to implement a bitcode producing llvm backend[1], which would
> > potentially
> > allow to use a range of llvm versions with ghc. However, this is only
> > tangentially
> >
Thanks Ben! When testing, I found that a type checker regression from 7.10
to 8.0 that I thought/hoped was resolved is in fact still present in this
release candidate. I filed a new bug:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12885
It originally seemed the same as #12175. But unfortunately,
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> However, what's changed from 8.0.1 to 8.0.2 to trigger this? I mean,
> is a point release supposed to do this? I would expect 8.0 to 8.1 to
> break, but find it surprising x.0.1 to x.0.2 would as well.
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m trying to implement a bitcode producing llvm backend[1], which would
potentially
> allow to use a range of llvm versions with ghc. However, this is only
tangentially
> relevant to the improved llvm backend, as Austin correctly pointed
out[2], as there are
> other complications
On 27 November 2016 at 01:37, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 25 November 2016 at 23:38, Ben Gamari wrote:
> >
> > As always, let us know if you encounter trouble. Thanks to everyone
> > who has contributed so far!
>
> No trouble building and running rc1, but