Hello guys,
I'm trying a fresh compile from master. These are the steps I've taken:
$ git clone http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc.git/
$ cd ghc
$ ./sync-all --testsuite get
followed by:
cp mk/build.mk.sample mk/build.mk
uncommenting #BuildFlavour = quick
and finally:
$ perl boot
$ ./configure
$
in a number of
ways. I recommend using my approach to sandboxes, which works fine
with ghc (http://www.edsko.net/2013/02/10/comprehensive-haskell-sandboxes/).
-E
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Alfredo Di Napoli
alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm trying a fresh compile from master
Thanks Fuuzetsu,
Tomorrow I'll still be at the ZuriHac, so hopefully I'll able to adjust the
patch :)
I'll poke you if you'll be around
Thanks!
Alfredo Di Napoli
On 07/giu/2014, at 07:23, GHC ghc-devs@haskell.org wrote:
#8226: Remove the old style -- # Haddock comments
Hello guys,
am I the only one to get the following when I run sh validate?
libraries/base/Data/Maybe.hs:139:1: Warning:
Defined but not used: ‘mapMaybeFB’
no location info:
Failing due to -Werror.
make[1]: *** [libraries/base/dist-install/doc/html/base/base.haddock] Error
1
make[1]: ***
Thanks Carter!
I have just asked basically about it on Reddit, in the announce thread.
I'll give it a spin, and if it works I will share the link (if you are ok
with that!) on the
same Reddit post.
Alfredo
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014, Carter Schonwald carter.schonw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Heres a
, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Alfredo Di Napoli
alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Carter!
I have just asked basically about it on Reddit, in the announce thread.
I'll give it a spin, and if it works I will share the link (if you are ok
with that!) on the
same Reddit post.
Alfredo
.
In conclusion, what do you think is the best approach, 1 or 2, both or
none? ;)
Thank you!
Alfredo
On 7 April 2017 at 18:30, Alfredo Di Napoli <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey Ben,
>
> thanks for the quite exhaustive reply! I’m on the go right now, but I
> promise
Hey all,
thanks a ton for the invaluable pointers. I’m now in the
“I-dunno-what-I-am-doing” mode banging SCC annotations like there is no
tomorrow, trying to spot any chance for some low-hanging-fruit algorithmic
improvement (like using a sequence instead of a list, etc), and will come
back to
Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:
> Alfredo Di Napoli <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hey Ben,
> >
> Hi Alfredo,
>
> Sorry for the late response! The email queue from the weekend was a bit
> longer than I would like.
>
> > as promi
Hey all,
I’m trying to compile GHC HEAD (cloning from master) with the `prof` build
flavour on a Mac OS X 10.11.6 machine and I have noticed that, despite
ghc-stage2 works as expected, when invoked with —interactive it starts
before crashing with a segmentation fault:
```
☁ compiler [master] ⚡
ther
than saying silly things, I would rather spend a bit of time reading
everything that has been written by folks way smarter than me on the
subject and get back to you folks later ;)
Alfredo
On 18 April 2017 at 14:21, Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:
> Alfredo Di Napoli &
Hey Ben,
thanks for the quite exhaustive reply! I’m on the go right now, but I
promise to get back to you with a meaningful reply later this weekend ;)
Alfredo
On 7 April 2017 at 18:22, Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:
> Alfredo Di Napoli <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com> wr
Hey folks,
maybe I’m setting up for something too ambitious for me, but I would like
to take an active stance to the overlasting “GHC compilation times are
terrible” matter, instead of simply stare at the screen with despair
whenever GHC compiles a sufficiently large Haskell program ;)
To make
/MachO.c:141
141 if(NULL != oc->info->nlist) {
Maybe it does ring a bell to any of you. In case not, I’m happy to continue
digging.
A.
On 14 April 2017 at 21:19, Alfredo Di Napoli <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey Ben,
>
> yes, it’s consistently repro
e's no point nicely
> indenting things or wrapping lines. The overhead is probably all in the
> layer of data structure that we generate in Pretty before it gets dumped
> into raw bytes. Using a ByteString Builder instead might yield some
> improvement.
>
> Cheers
> Simon
>
>
> Do you happen to know of DynFlagPlugins, Adam?
Alas the newly release LiquidHaskell plugin relies on the `dynflagsPlugin`
action, so it would be nice if this was not removed:
https://github.com/ucsd-progsys/liquidhaskell/blob/develop/src/Language/Haskell/Liquid/GHC/Plugin.hs#L146
Ignoring the
Hi Richard,
I am running 10.15.7 and I think I upgraded to Catalina months ago (but I
don't exactly recall when). From my experience, everything works just fine,
at least for my current workflow (clients' projects, GHC development etc).
At work I have successfully used GHC 8.6.5 and 8.10.2 for
Dear all,
As some of you might know, for the past few months I have been working on
changing GHC's diagnostic messages from plain SDocs to richer Haskell types.
As part of this work, I have added a mechanism to embed hints into
diagnostics, defined in `GHC.Types.Hint` in `HEAD`. One of the main
es, but only with
> other plugins, and probably with vanishingly few of them. Grep in Hackage!
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs *On Behalf Of *Alfredo Di
> Napoli
> *Sent:* 06 July 2021 10:14
> *To:* Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
> *Subject:* Can N
Hello folks,
as some of you might know me and Richard are reworking how GHC constructs,
emits and deals with errors and warnings (See
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/Errors-as-(structured)-values
and #18516).
To summarise very briefly the spirit, we will have (eventually) proper
suppose an alternative is that the TcGblEnv could have a second IORef to
> use for error messages that come from desugaring during TH splices.
>
>
>
> Nothing deeper than that I think.
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs *On Behalf Of *Alfredo Di
>
e, 30 Mar 2021 at 16:14, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:57 AM, Alfredo Di Napoli
> wrote:
>
> I'll explore the idea of adding a second IORef.
>
>
> Renaming/type-checking is already mutually recursive. (The renamer must
> call the type-checker
think my cunning plan of embedding is crumbling -- I suspect we would
end up with a type `TcRnDsMessage` which captures the dependency.
Sorry for not seeing it sooner!
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 08:05, Alfredo Di Napoli
wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> *Richard*: sorry! Unfortunately
)
>
> Anyways, while we could also do a "RnTsDsError" and split later, I hope
> Alfredo's alternative of embedding won't be too much harder and prepare us
> for these exciting areas of exploration.
>
> John
> On 3/30/21 10:14 AM, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
>
>
&g
*TL;DR If you recently had merge conflicts related to error and
messages in GHC, here I give migration guidelines. Otherwise,
feel free to ignore this email.*
Good morning all,
If you had some work-in-progress branch that was emitting errors or
warnings (either adding new ones or modifying
rmation the wrapping isn't purely superfluous.
>
> I think this would pose no practical problem today, while still "soft
> enforcing" the abstraction boundaries we want.
>
> On 3/31/21 3:45 AM, Alfredo Di Napoli wrote:
>
> Follow up:
>
> Argh! I have just seen
Good morning all,
I have now split Richard's commit in two, so that it's explicit in the
commit history that we are adding those instances:
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5509/diffs?commit_id=2cbad0e7ced9de896eb9a1732631786a6adb676a
*Ben*: I have briefly tried to add the
ses like this, free of
> backwards compat issues.
>
> -Edward
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 3:00 AM Alfredo Di Napoli <
> alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello Simon,
>>
>> Yes, renaming and perhaps keeping `RecordPuns` as a pattern synon
Hello Matthew,
Perhaps it would be too niche of a resource, but what about collecting
these options either in a Wiki page in GHC or maybe a short blog post on
your website (if that's not the case already)? I personally use
`--flavour=default+no_profiled_libs+omit_pragmas` all the time with
Hi Norman,
in addition to what Ben already said: is there any particular reason you
wanted to use the stage0 compiler? I have written a small program against
HEAD which used the GHC API fairly recently, and I have simply used the
`stage1` compiler. An excerpt from my little code snippet:
```
--
30 matches
Mail list logo
