On 15 December 2017 at 19:03, Gershom B wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Boespflug, Mathieu wrote:
>> I did mean that one, yes. That was my question earlier - is Cabal
>> along with *all* core libraries covered by the CLC's 3-release policy?
>
> The 3
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Boespflug, Mathieu wrote:
> I did mean that one, yes. That was my question earlier - is Cabal
> along with *all* core libraries covered by the CLC's 3-release policy?
The 3 release policy does not apply to all libraries maintained by the
CLC. It
On 15 December 2017 at 16:32, Ben Gamari wrote:
> "Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback, Michael.
>>
>> Manuel, I believe you are also a Cabal-the-library consumer in Haskell For
>> Mac?
>>
>> Michael, you brought up another problem
"Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
> Thanks for the feedback, Michael.
>
> Manuel, I believe you are also a Cabal-the-library consumer in Haskell For
> Mac?
>
> Michael, you brought up another problem tangentially related to the
> original integer-gmp issue but that was not in my
Hi Mathieu,
On 15 December 2017 at 08:41, Boespflug, Mathieu wrote:
> In principle, every single
> Hackage package out there, which all have a Setup.hs script.
Also, the build-type: Simple packages (which are the vast majority on
Hackage) are not affected at all, because they all
Hi Mathieu,
On 15 December 2017 at 08:41, Boespflug, Mathieu wrote:
> How many other
> users of Cabal-the-library are there? In principle, every single
> Hackage package out there, which all have a Setup.hs script.
This is not such a big deal now, because build-type: Custom