Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-11 Thread Jan Stolarek
...@gmail.com [mailto:michael.snoy...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Snoyman *Sent:* 10 September 2013 05:28 *To:* Simon Peyton-Jones *Cc:* core-libraries-commit...@haskell.org; ghc-devs; Geoffrey Mainland; Jan Stolarek *Subject:* Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

RE: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| Sent: 09 September 2013 16:14 | To: Jan Stolarek | Cc: ghc-devs | Subject: Re: Alex and new Bool primops | | I say this only somewhat facetiously, but this is *exactly* the sort of | problem that the pro-backwards compatibility camp anticipates, and I | mean the pro-backwards compatibility camp

Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Geoffrey Mainland
; Geoffrey Mainland; Jan Stolarek *Subject:* Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops I'll admit a fair amount of ignorance of the GHC build process. But wouldn't it be standard that any tool used in the GHC build process itself, and built by GHC itself, would

Re: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-10 Thread Jan Stolarek
jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com Wysłane: wtorek, 10 wrzesień 2013 9:53:07 Temat: RE: [core libraries] RE: Alex and new Bool primops (Simon M: are you ok with updating Alex? You were the one of those who argued strongly for using the old names for the new primops

Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-09 Thread Jan Stolarek
I am refactoring new Bool primops (#6135). There was a discussion on core-libraries-commitee list and the decision was made that we should keep names of primops we used so far and change their type signature (right now HEAD has different names for new primops and reuses old names for

Re: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-09 Thread Geoffrey Mainland
Perhaps the core libraries committee should reconsider their decision? :) Backwards compatibility is good. If HEAD implements the backwards compatibility plan that Simon PJ and I suggested and said plan is working, there should be a compelling reason to break compatibility and have to go chasing

Re: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-09 Thread Geoffrey Mainland
- Oryginalna wiadomość - Od: Geoffrey Mainland mainl...@apeiron.net Do: Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl DW: ghc-devs ghc-devs@haskell.org Wysłane: poniedziałek, 9 wrzesień 2013 15:40:09 Temat: Re: Alex and new Bool primops Perhaps the core libraries committee should reconsider their decision

Re: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-09 Thread Jan Stolarek
: Geoffrey Mainland mainl...@apeiron.net Do: Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl DW: ghc-devs ghc-devs@haskell.org Wysłane: poniedziałek, 9 wrzesień 2013 15:40:09 Temat: Re: Alex and new Bool primops Perhaps the core libraries committee should reconsider their decision? :) Backwards compatibility

RE: Alex and new Bool primops

2013-09-09 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
September 2013 16:14 | To: Jan Stolarek | Cc: ghc-devs | Subject: Re: Alex and new Bool primops | | I say this only somewhat facetiously, but this is *exactly* the sort of | problem that the pro-backwards compatibility camp anticipates, and I | mean the pro-backwards compatibility camp in the most