Ben Gamari writes:
> Michael Snoyman writes:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant
>> customers with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally
>> to their codebases, so it's not a necessity to get this into upstream GHC
>> 7.10.
Michael Snoyman writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant
> customers with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally
> to their codebases, so it's not a necessity to get this into upstream GHC
> 7.10. It would be nice if the librar
gt;
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Snoyman [mailto:mich...@snoyman.com]
> *Sent:* 13 July 2015 18:33
> *To:* Simon Peyton Jones; Mateusz Kowalczyk; ghc-devs@haskell.org
> *Cc:* Mark Lentczner
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
>
>
; Mateusz Kowalczyk; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Cc: Mark Lentczner
Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
Hi Simon,
We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant customers
with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally to their
codebases, so it&#x
the guys you have to persuade if you really want
> | this.
> | > I suspect it'll be more effective to open a ticket, milestoned for
> | > 7.10.2, with specifics on it. Email gets lost; tickets don't.
> |
> | Noted, thanks.
> |
> | > Thanks
> | >
Thanks
| >
| > Simon
| >
| >
| > | -Original Message-
| > | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| > | Mateusz Kowalczyk
| > | Sent: 06 July 2015 17:40
| > | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| > | Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc t
lestoned for 7.10.2,
> with specifics on it. Email gets lost; tickets don't.
Noted, thanks.
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
>
> | -Original Message-
> | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
> | Kowalczyk
> | Sent: 06 July 20
czyk
| Sent: 06 July 2015 17:40
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
|
| On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
| > Hello everybody,
| >
| > I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part
| of
| > my w
On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
> my work for FP Complete!
>
> With the help of Eric (thanks for your support in #ghc!) we now have this
> patch for 7.10 and 7.8.
>
> As promised,
On 21/04/15 01:29, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> We would like to make 7.8 and 7.10 binaries with this feature available as
> well, and will do so after getting a review!
Here's a 64-bit Linux binary distribution of 7.10 including this backport:
https://github.com/nh2/ghc/releases/tag/ghc-7.10.1-r
On 22/04/15 02:42, RodLogic wrote:
> Fyi: what about assert? Afaik, there is special treatment in the
> compiler for the assert that could be replaced by this (?).
Yes, replacing the custom code for `assert` was also on Eric's plan, see
the comment he just made:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/
On 22/04/15 01:33, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> I will upload that as a Phabricator Diff soon, and mention the URL here.
Here it is: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D861
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
Hi Niklas,
Fyi: what about assert? Afaik, there is special treatment in the compiler
for the assert that could be replaced by this (?).
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> Yes, I do have work in progress on using this feature in `error` and
> `undefined`.
>
> I will upload tha
Yes, I do have work in progress on using this feature in `error` and
`undefined`.
I will upload that as a Phabricator Diff soon, and mention the URL here.
Niklas
On 21/04/15 02:07, Greg Weber wrote:
> Thanks a lot! Is there any plan to make error or other partial functions
> in the base librarie
Thanks a lot! Is there any plan to make error or other partial functions in
the base libraries use this feature?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
> my work for FP Complete!
>
Hello everybody,
I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
my work for FP Complete!
With the help of Eric (thanks for your support in #ghc!) we now have this
patch for 7.10 and 7.8.
As promised, here are the commits:
* https://github.com/nh2/ghc/commits/ghc-7.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. If/when we decide to backport the patch,
we'll be sure to make the commit available for others interested in running
a custom build of GHC. And thank you for the offer of help Eric, it's much
appreciated :)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:14 PM Eric Seidel wrote:
> II
IIRC the patch doesn't directly depend on -fwarn-redundant-constraints,
but I think I ran into some merge conflicts that had to be resolved. I
agree with Austin that backporting it should be doable, and would be
happy to help if there's interest.
Also, I still mean to submit a follow-on patch that
Hi Michael,
I actually tried to adopt this patch into 7.10, because I thought it
was needed for another dependent patch we wanted. Unfortunately, the
backtrace-via-implicit-params patch seems to depend on some prior work
by Simon PJ in the typechecker (-fwarn-redundant-constraints, a rather
large
Subject: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
It looks like the srcLoc change[1] is something that some of our (FP
Complete's) customers would be quite interested in getting access to sooner
rather than later. Would there be any possibility of getting that patch merged
into the 7.10 bran
It looks like the srcLoc change[1] is something that some of our (FP
Complete's) customers would be quite interested in getting access to sooner
rather than later. Would there be any possibility of getting that patch
merged into the 7.10 branch of GHC? I'm not sure if I'd try my luck at
actually in
21 matches
Mail list logo
