at 10:05 PM, Takenobu Tani wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> The ghc-binary for windows needs to `make install` since ghc-9.0 [1].
>>> Is this an intended change?
>>>
>>> Previously, ghc-8.10.4 binary for windows [2] doesn't need to `make
>
e ghc-binary for windows needs to `make install` since ghc-9.0 [1].
>> Is this an intended change?
>>
>> Previously, ghc-8.10.4 binary for windows [2] doesn't need to `make
>> install`.
>> We only expand the tar-file and then we can execute `bin/ghcii.sh`.
>>
e install` since ghc-9.0 [1].
> Is this an intended change?
>
> Previously, ghc-8.10.4 binary for windows [2] doesn't need to `make
> install`.
> We only expand the tar-file and then we can execute `bin/ghcii.sh`.
>
> [1]:
> https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/9.0.1/ghc-9.0.1-x
Hi devs,
The ghc-binary for windows needs to `make install` since ghc-9.0 [1].
Is this an intended change?
Previously, ghc-8.10.4 binary for windows [2] doesn't need to `make install`.
We only expand the tar-file and then we can execute `bin/ghcii.sh`.
[1]:
https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2020, 11:37 -0400 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> As no one has objected, let's move ahead with this proposal. GHC 8.12.1
> shall henceforth be 9.0.1.
Allow me to fix the Subject of this mail thread then ;-)
--
Joachim Breitner
m...@joachim-breitner.de
ce Monster,
> simplified subsumption
> * Better register allocation, improving runtime by 0.8% according to
> release notes
> * ghc-bignum
> * Explicit specificity and eager instantiation
> * Qualified do
> * Lexical negation
> * Perhaps Quick Look will manage to land
>
"Alan & Kim Zimmerman" writes:
> Which sounds like we have agreed on 9.0?
>
I've not heard any objections so I am happy to push through the change.
However, I'm waiting another day before formally announcing. The earlier
email was a bit of a slip on my part.
If anyone sees a good reason why
Which sounds like we have agreed on 9.0?
Alan
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, 00:28 Ben Gamari, wrote:
> Artem Pelenitsyn writes:
>
> > Does Quick Look still have chances to make it into the next release?
> > It'd be fascinating if the major version bump got both linear and
> > impredicative types!
> >
Artem Pelenitsyn writes:
> Does Quick Look still have chances to make it into the next release?
> It'd be fascinating if the major version bump got both linear and
> impredicative types!
>
I'm afraid not. Quick Look will need to wait for 9.2.
Cheers,
- Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP
; * Linear types
>>> >> * Large-scale typechecker changes - Taming the Kind Inference
>Monster,
>>> >> simplified subsumption
>>> >> * Better register allocation, improving runtime by 0.8% according
>to
>>> >> release notes
>>>
runtime by 0.8% according to
release notes
* ghc-bignum
* Explicit specificity and eager instantiation
* Qualified do
* Lexical negation
* Perhaps Quick Look will manage to land
Should we call it GHC 9.0? I think the name would be deserved.
___
ghc-devs
11 matches
Mail list logo
