RE: Perf improvement

Bump it down, maybe... it got /better/! | -Original Message- | From: Ben Gamari [mailto:b...@smart-cactus.org] | Sent: 14 September 2017 16:54 | To: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>; ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Perf improvement | | Simon Peyton Jones via gh

Re: Perf improvement

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I'm seeing this in validate > > bytes allocated value is too low: > > (If this is because you have improved GHC, please > > update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) > > ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated:

Re: Perf improvement

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I'm seeing this in validate > > bytes allocated value is too low: > > (If this is because you have improved GHC, please > > update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) > > ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated:

Perf improvement

I'm seeing this in validate bytes allocated value is too low: (If this is because you have improved GHC, please update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated: 56782344 +/-7% Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52807579 Upper