When you pulled the latest version from git did you pull both arcanist
and libphutil? I think I saw a similar error when I missed one. Also
`arc upgrade` should do the right thing for you (in the future).
~adam
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, at 09:23 PM, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated the
Hello,
I've updated the implementation to match the discussion from this morning.
The idea is that `TypeError msd` is a type-family that can never be
reduced, similar to `Any`. We don't do anything special in the constraint
solver, however when printing errors, if we encounter any constraints of
I have also written my thoughts on the questions posed by Richard on the
wiki page.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Richard Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2015, at 10:02 AM, "Augustsson, Lennart" <
> lennart.augusts...@sc.com> wrote:
>
> > I've put in my answers to your questions.
>
> And I
On Oct 28, 2015, at 10:02 AM, "Augustsson, Lennart"
wrote:
> I've put in my answers to your questions.
And I've responded.
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
On Oct 28, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> It does look pretty reasonable but keep in mind that there are a number
> of comments on the Phabricator Diff that still need to be addressed.
And I have three burning questions at the bottom of the wiki page
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wik
Iavor Diatchki writes:
>> I think that the branch should be in an OK state, except that it is not
>> merged with the latest HEAD.
>
It does look pretty reasonable but keep in mind that there are a number
of comments on the Phabricator Diff that still need to be addressed.
Thanks!
- Ben
signa
It would be great to document some of these common workflows.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
| Pickering
| Sent: 27 October 2015 21:10
| To: Iavor Diatchki
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Type-level error
t;> > Hello,
>> >
>> Hello!
>>
>> Very good timing on the message; we just finished discussing your work
>> not more than an hour ago. You can disregard my message; I didn't notice
>> yours before sending it.
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:
eyton Jones <
> simo...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I’ve forgotten the state of your type-level error messages work. How’s
> it
> >> going?
> >>
> >> I think we should try to add it to 8.0.1. The current status is that
> the
t;
>> I’ve forgotten the state of your type-level error messages work. How’s it
>> going?
>>
>> I think we should try to add it to 8.0.1. The current status is that the
>> idea is implemented on a branch. Then, there were some comments and
>> sugge
Simon Peyton Jones writes:
> I’ve forgotten the state of your type-level error messages work. How’s it
> going?
>
> Iavor Diatchki writes:
>
> > I think we should try to add it to 8.0.1. The current status is that
> > the idea is implemented on a branch. The
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
wrote:
> I’ve forgotten the state of your type-level error messages work. How’s it
> going?
>
> I think we should try to add it to 8.0.1. The current status is that the
> idea is implemented on a branch. Then,
I’ve forgotten the state of your type-level error messages work. How’s it
going?
I think we should try to add it to 8.0.1. The current status is that the idea
is implemented on a branch. Then, there were some comments and suggestions
that maybe we should do things in a different way
13 matches
Mail list logo
