Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Using ghdl together with the Xilinx ISE tool chain

2012-01-15 Thread David Koontz
See addendum at bottom. On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:14 PM, David Koontz wrote: On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote: While technically challenging, a rather dry subject. Getting to the actual error: On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote: Second,

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] postfitting timing simulation with XIlinx

2012-01-15 Thread David Koontz
On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:10 PM, tging...@free.fr wrote: Part of the understanding required to implement the semantic restrictions therein would be understanding what is meant by discrete range and whether di'length-1 is valid as a bound of a discrete range. No, because of: --

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] teaching with GHDL -- VHPI an VHDL-2008

2012-01-15 Thread David Koontz
On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Walter F.J. Mueller wrote: I put it a little wider: - when ghdl wants to survive on the long run it has to implement also the major vhdl-2008 language features in the future. - by the time vhdl-2008 is supported by synthesis tools one wants to use some of