On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:15 +0900, D. Jeff Dionne wrote:
We use GHDL for simulation of (digital blocks of) mixed signal chips and a
large
SoC under development. We can test once there is a tagged release candidate.
I'm not sure if this has been found and corrected or not: function mod
Thanks Brian,
Just for clarity, it was only mod that was a problem from math_real,
so it seems (a reimplementation of?) ieee.math_real is present. This
is 0.29.
Cheers, thanks again,
J.
The problem was the licensing terms of the IEEE math libraries; these
terms have been relaxed and they are
On 2014-01-05, tging...@free.fr wrote:
I think we are ready for a new release.
I did a quick testrun with today's snapshot to see if I can still build
a Debian package. It looks good. The build runs almost without problems.
The resulting compiler works well on my favorite VHDL project.
I ran
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:21 +0100, Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
On 2014-01-05, tging...@free.fr wrote:
I think we are ready for a new release.
I did a quick testrun with today's snapshot to see if I can still build
a Debian package. It looks good. The build runs almost without problems.
The
On 7 Jan 2014, at 11:13 am, Brian Drummond br...@shapes.demon.co.uk wrote:
I have also added the tag 0.31rc1 (Tristan, should I just re-tag as
0.31?)
As soon as you do I'll build an OS X version.
___
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:21 +0100, Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
On 2014-01-05, tging...@free.fr wrote:
I think we are ready for a new release.
I did a quick testrun with today's snapshot to see if I can still
build
a Debian package. It looks good. The build runs almost without
