Re: [Ghdl-discuss] An Eclipse IDE for GHDL with GTKWAVE integrated

2014-07-22 Thread Nicole Fontenot
Give me some time to look over the Exuberant Ctags code-base and I'll see what I can do. Can there be some general discussion with, exactly what are the shortcomings of the current parser: - Is there a problem with ctags not understanding that entity blocks and architecture blocks are

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] An Eclipse IDE for GHDL with GTKWAVE integrated

2014-07-22 Thread tgingold
Give me some time to look over the Exuberant Ctags code-base and I'll see what I can do. Can there be some general discussion with, exactly what are the shortcomings of the current parser: * Is there a problem with ctags not understanding that entity blocks and architecture blocks

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] An Eclipse IDE for GHDL with GTKWAVE integrated

2014-07-22 Thread Nicole Fontenot
While ctags has the option to use regex to parse the source files, it is not what is being used for the vhdl module of ctags. The regex is only brought into the equation when the tags file is written for vhdl. A solution involving ctags would require at least a partial re-parse and rewrite of the

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] An Eclipse IDE for GHDL with GTKWAVE integrated

2014-07-22 Thread David Koontz
On 22 Jul 2014, at 9:32 pm, Nicole Fontenot robwob...@gmail.com wrote: Give me some time to look over the Exuberant Ctags code-base and I'll see what I can do. Can there be some general discussion with, exactly what are the shortcomings of the current parser: Is there a problem with ctags

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Ghdl-discuss Digest, Vol 104, Issue 10

2014-07-22 Thread Vern Muhr
-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /public/ghdl-discuss/attachments/20140722/1710c4d2/attachment.html -- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:59:19 +1200 From