Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Something wrong with my build of ghdl, but I don't know what failed.

Just an observation. When building with make, I see that gcc-5 and gcc are used like this example: gcc-5 -c -I./src -I./src/vhdl -I./src/psl -I./src/vhdl/translate -I./src/ghdldrv -I./src/grt -I./src/ortho -I./src/ortho/llvm-nodebug -I./src/ghdldrv -gnaty3befhkmr -gnatwae -gnatf -gnat05 -g -gnata

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Something wrong with my build of ghdl, but I don't know what failed.

On 14 November 2016 at 20:34, Tristan Gingold wrote: > Try to add -v options: ghdl -m -v -v ... ghdl -m -v -v --ieee=synopsys mc8051_top_struc_cfg ... lots of lines indicating that /usr/local/bin/ghdl1-llvm is doing its job ... /usr/local/bin/ghdl1-llvm:note: List of units

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Something wrong with my build of ghdl, but I don't know what failed.

On 14/11/16 15:48, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: Hi, just pulled latest ghdl from github and rebuild the way I usually do: git pull make distclean ./configure --with-llvm-config make sudo make install First thing I notice is when building a project I have built before is: ghdl -m --ieee=synopsys

[Ghdl-discuss] Something wrong with my build of ghdl, but I don't know what failed.

Hi, just pulled latest ghdl from github and rebuild the way I usually do: git pull make distclean ./configure --with-llvm-config make sudo make install First thing I notice is when building a project I have built before is: ghdl -m --ieee=synopsys mc8051_top_struc_cfg elaborate

[Ghdl-discuss] FOSDEM 2017 EDA devroom: call for participation

Dear all, The call for participation in the FOSDEM 2017 EDA devroom is open: http://www.ohwr.org/projects/ohr-meta/wiki/FOSDEM2017 Feel free to submit proposals for a talk, tutorial or demo, and to pass this on to anybody you think could be interested. Cheers, Javier

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Synthesis for FPGAs / XML dump

On 11/04/2016 01:34 PM, why...@f-cpu.org wrote: Le 2016-11-04 10:59, Martin Strubel a écrit : On the other side there's a lot of possibilities for fun stuff, like creating SVG images from the XML using built-in browser XSL abilities. That's the best-looking idea of today ! I want that :-)