Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-27 Thread tgingold
Hello, On 23 Dec 2013, at 8:40 pm, tging...@free.fr wrote: I think that ghdl is compliant with VHDL 1993 and 2002. That's modulo bugs, but I think that all features are implemented. If not, do not hesitate to raise issues. The issue isn't features (syntax), it's compliance

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-23 Thread Joris van Rantwijk
Hi David, On 2013-12-23, David Koontz wrote: The ghdl source code is distributed under GPLv2 (but can be redistributed via or-later). Oh, ok. Thanks for clarifying. That is what I mean with GPLv2-or-later and what Tristan calls GPLv2+. I was worried for a moment because some software projects

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-23 Thread David Koontz
On 23 Dec 2013, at 8:40 pm, tging...@free.fr wrote: I think that ghdl is compliant with VHDL 1993 and 2002. That's modulo bugs, but I think that all features are implemented. If not, do not hesitate to raise issues. The issue isn't features (syntax), it's compliance (semantics). library

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-23 Thread David Koontz
On 23 Dec 2013, at 8:40 pm, tging...@free.fr wrote: I think that ghdl is compliant with VHDL 1993 and 2002. That's modulo bugs, but I think that all features are implemented. If not, do not hesitate to raise issues. entity label_test is generic (MODE: natural range 0 to 1 := 1); end

[Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-22 Thread Neeraj Yadav
I have made a small cloud based verilog/vhdl simulator which uses GHDL and Icarus for VHDL and Verilog respectively. http://www.tarangeda.com I want comments of ghdl developers, anything you want to say. Plus I have a few questions also 1. Do people use ghdl professionally, or is it still far

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-22 Thread Thomas Sailer
On 12/22/2013 04:40 PM, Neeraj Yadav wrote: 1. Do people use ghdl professionally, or is it still far from any professional use(I heard this on comp.arch.fpga) I use it professionally. I also want to contribute to GHDL, I need someone to give me a clear idea how far ghdl from say a OEM

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-22 Thread David Koontz
On 23 Dec 2013, at 4:40 am, Neeraj Yadav neer4j.iit.de...@gmail.com wrote: I have made a small cloud based verilog/vhdl simulator which uses GHDL and Icarus for VHDL and Verilog respectively. http://www.tarangeda.com I want comments of ghdl developers, anything you want to say. Makes a

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-22 Thread Joris van Rantwijk
On 2013-12-23, David Koontz wrote: Makes a great argument for binary distribution under the Affero GPLv3. As Tristan noted earlier a binary work comprised of gcc and a ghdl front end the gcc compiler is distributed under the terms of the GPLv3, which allows adhesion to the Affero GPLv3.

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Seeking comments on my cloud based verification ide

2013-12-22 Thread tgingold
Hello, On 23 Dec 2013, at 4:40 am, Neeraj Yadav neer4j.iit.de...@gmail.com wrote: I have made a small cloud based verilog/vhdl simulator which uses GHDL and Icarus for VHDL and Verilog respectively. http://www.tarangeda.com I want comments of ghdl developers, anything you want