Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Comparison of ghdl and Cadence Incisive
Hello, in that case you'd better to use your design and your testbench. They are certainly representative of your coding style and you know them well. Regards. Envoyé avec AquaMail pour Android http://www.aqua-mail.com Le 10 avril 2017 15:24:24 Simon Thijs de Feber a écrit : I need to prove that GHDL is giving me the same results as Incisive. W'll be taping-out a design some where this year. Although I have confidence GHDL is following the VHDL LRM I do not like unexpected surprises after all. br, ST On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Rene Doss wrote: What would you compare? A performance check? Or what? Am 07.04.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Thijs de Feber: I'll need to do a functional comparison between GHDL and Cadence Incisive. I just can throw a IP and it's TB at it to do some checks. However this is not really an intelligent way to do it. How could I approach this ? Take the test suite of GHDL and run this in both simulators ? best regards Simon ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing listGhdl-discuss@gna.orghttps://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss -- ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Comparison of ghdl and Cadence Incisive
I need to prove that GHDL is giving me the same results as Incisive. W'll be taping-out a design some where this year. Although I have confidence GHDL is following the VHDL LRM I do not like unexpected surprises after all. br, ST On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Rene Doss wrote: > What would you compare? > > A performance check? > > Or what? > > > Am 07.04.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Thijs de Feber: > > I'll need to do a functional comparison between GHDL and Cadence Incisive. > I just can throw a IP and it's TB at it to do some checks. However this is > not really an intelligent way to do it. > > How could I approach this ? > Take the test suite of GHDL and run this in both simulators ? > > best regards > > Simon > > > > > > > > ___ > Ghdl-discuss mailing > listGhdl-discuss@gna.orghttps://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss > > > > ___ > Ghdl-discuss mailing list > Ghdl-discuss@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss > > ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Comparison of ghdl and Cadence Incisive
What would you compare? A performance check? Or what? Am 07.04.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Thijs de Feber: > I'll need to do a functional comparison between GHDL and Cadence > Incisive. > I just can throw a IP and it's TB at it to do some checks. However > this is not really an intelligent way to do it. > > How could I approach this ? > Take the test suite of GHDL and run this in both simulators ? > > best regards > > Simon > > > > > > > > ___ > Ghdl-discuss mailing list > Ghdl-discuss@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss ___ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
