Hi,
Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 05:24:03PM +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
The goal (I thought) was to keep the lowest levels (GEGL etc)
of GIMP's back-end LGPL.
I don't see any reason to do that. Are any of us likely to benefit from
(usually small and rather
Him
Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I finally had time to try again, and after some head scratching and
Makefile.am munging, succeeded. I built all the libraries that get
built as shared libraries on Unix as DLLs, while Hans's MSVC Makefiles
build many (most?) as static libraries.
First I would like to note that I have no idea wether my employer would
be intereseted or not but I wanted to test the waters on this subject
before presenting them even with this scenerio. I would also like to
apologize if this is the wrong place for such a discussion but I was
unsure where
