On 09/06/2011 10:55 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Haven't we got a quite nice Python interface already?
> Yes we do, which is nice, but Scheme still has higher status. In
> particular, the format of gimprc files etc are Scheme-ish, and the
> default batch interpreter is Script-Fu.
>
The format of
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
>> So, is there any progress on the idea of a GIMP ultra-ultra light for
>> smart phones?
>
> In my not so humble opinion there is little to no point making a
> lighter version of GIMP for mobile devices. Simply put, desktop and
> mobile
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> Friends,
>
> I see there was a thread on this topic in May 2008. I'm frustrated by
> the inability to do some basic transformations of images on my Android
> smart phone, for example: rotating by just a degree or two, instead of a
> full 90
Friends,
I see there was a thread on this topic in May 2008. I'm frustrated by
the inability to do some basic transformations of images on my Android
smart phone, for example: rotating by just a degree or two, instead of a
full 90 degrees; inability to change from RGB to grayscale; and
inabili
2011/9/5 Ofnuts :
> On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can
>> see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax
>> where 1 + 1 is written "1 + 1" and not "(+ 1 1)". If we want to have a
>> main script
