Re: [Gimp-developer] Dependency version changes (was: GEGL in GIMP)

2003-12-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By "in an organised way", I mean simply that we make a decent effort > before changing build requirements to let people know that they're > going to be changed, when, why, and what they need to do to keep a > working GIMP CVS build environment. This is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dependency version changes (was: GEGL in GIMP)

2003-12-22 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, This has split into 2 different issues again, replying twice with appropriate subjects. Sven Neumann wrote: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I think that we could perhaps do the version bump in an organised way this time, at least? What are you trying to say here? I don't remember any