Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-06 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/9/5 Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net: On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax where 1 + 1 is written 1 + 1 and not (+ 1 1). If we want to have a main

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-06 Thread Ofnuts
On 09/06/2011 10:55 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: Haven't we got a quite nice Python interface already? Yes we do, which is nice, but Scheme still has higher status. In particular, the format of gimprc files etc are Scheme-ish, and the default batch interpreter is Script-Fu. The format of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-05 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/9/5 Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de: I'd like to comment on the blog post, or see comments by someone else, but I'd like to clarify our plans for Scheme in GIMP first. If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can see that the vast majority of languages in use

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-05 Thread Ofnuts
On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax where 1 + 1 is written 1 + 1 and not (+ 1 1). If we want to have a main scripting language that as many as