Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to move it into the GIMP source tree if it was started as a separate

Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Dave Neary
Manish Singh wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote: The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project. But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the intent from the beginning. I don't see how incubation helps it in any way. There are people who have

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] Gradient-Fu for 1.3.x - Complete but not Final

2003-12-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Shlomi, Shlomi Fish wrote: Check: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/grad-fu/1-3-x.html for a link to the up-to-date patch. Thanks for the patch. Would you mind attaching this to the bug report, just in case your hard-drive fries over the holidays or something? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary

Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Manish Singh wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote: The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project. But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the intent from the beginning. I don't see

Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to

Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Dave Neary
Manish Singh wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: OK - fair enough. It's a standalone project. But we're going to use it, and need it, and from what I recall, calvin was looking for more GIMP input into what it should do. How do you propose we get that kind of

[Gimp-developer] Re: [PATCH] Gradient-Fu for 1.3.x - Complete but not Final

2003-12-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Dave Neary wrote: Hi Shlomi, Shlomi Fish wrote: Check: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/grad-fu/1-3-x.html for a link to the up-to-date patch. Thanks for the patch. Would you mind attaching this to the bug report, just in case your hard-drive fries over the

Re: [Gegl-developer] Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL in GIMP

2003-12-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to move it into the GIMP source tree if it

[Gimp-developer] Gradient fill not working in CVS Head

2003-12-23 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi there, I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of the gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled. Anyway, the fill is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient fill not working in CVS Head

2003-12-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of the gradient, is taking up almost all the

[Gimp-developer] GIMP Aqua GTK+OSX

2003-12-23 Thread Robin Rowe
GIMP on Mac OS X without X11: http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/docs/gimp.html Cheers, Robin --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hollywood, California www.CinePaint.org Free motion picture and still image editing software

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient fill not working in CVS Head

2003-12-23 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 19:40, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient fill not working in CVS Head

2003-12-23 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In another message you wrote: I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of the gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled. Have you