> I'm not really able to develop (not yet), so I made a little splash-screen
> image, because I saw on the bugzilla that a new splash-screen was needed.
Thank you for taking the time to make one, but it does not look
professional enough imo to be the official 2.4 splash, mainly because of
the to
Hi,
I have submitted a patch which (slightly) improves the quality of the print
plugin (see Bug #387604). The problem basically was that Postscript can't
cope with transparency. In contrast, PDF is able to do so.
The current implementation/patch now has a disadvantage: if you print to a
postscrip
David Gowers wrote:
>> The what's new document for each release is a good resource for these
>> kinds of problems, especially its porting section:
>
>> http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/porting.html
The last two items on that page seem to be the more likely candidates that
could cause problems. I
Stefan Roellin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have submitted a patch which (slightly) improves the quality of the print
>plugin (see Bug #387604). The problem basically was that Postscript can't
>cope with transparency. In contrast, PDF is able to do so.
>
>The current implementation/patch now has a disadvantag
