RE: [Gimp-developer] Your message to Gimp-announce awaits moderator approval

2002-06-08 Thread Branko Collin
On 7 Jun 2002, at 19:18, Art Hughes wrote: I received an email about my message being held for the moderator, I did not know I sent one. If you could please forward it back to me, maybe I can determine how you got it. I'm running a Mandrake Linux box with Evolution 1.0.2 as my mail client. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] dependancies

2002-06-08 Thread Philip Brown
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:02:02PM -0700, Akkana wrote: I just wrote up a page listing the packages I installed to build various versions of the gimp on my Redhat and Debian machines (in addition to whatever I previously had installed). ... Fortunately the 1.3.7 tarball builds fine, so the

Re: [Gimp-developer] dependancies

2002-06-08 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Akkana [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://shallowsky.com/gimpbuild.html Cool. You say on that page: | for some reason, CVS builds have more dependencies than tarball builds. At least one such reason (I'm not sure whether it's the only one) is that the CVS repository does not include

Re: [Gimp-developer] dependancies

2002-06-08 Thread Philip Brown
Ah, durnit... I forgot which part of things I was building, and just cut-n-pasted. i thought I was building gimp at that point. sorry folks ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] dependancies

2002-06-08 Thread Philip Brown
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for checking and making the list. Actually, I used all tarballs. I did not use CVS for any of it. So now I have an executable built. It just doesnt work properly, and makes