On Tuesday 23 December 2003 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In another message you wrote:
> >I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in
> > CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of
> > the gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled.
>
>
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 19:40, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug
> > report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working
> > poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggni
GIMP on Mac OS X without X11:
http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/docs/gimp.html
Cheers,
Robin
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hollywood, California
www.CinePaint.org Free motion picture and still image editing software
__
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug
> report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working
> poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first
> segment of the gradient, is taking up almost al
Hi there,
I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug
report.
I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS
HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of the
gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled.
Anyway, the fill is f
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
> > compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
> > historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to
> > move it into the GIMP source tre
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi Shlomi,
>
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Check:
> >
> > http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/grad-fu/1-3-x.html
> >
> > for a link to the up-to-date patch.
>
> Thanks for the patch. Would you mind attaching this to the bug report,
> just in case your hard-drive
Manish Singh wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
OK - fair enough. It's a standalone project. But we're going to use it,
and need it, and from what I recall, calvin was looking for more GIMP
input into what it should do. How do you propose we get that kind of
comm
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
> >compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
> >historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wan
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> >>The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project.
> >But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the intent from the
> >beginning.
> >
Hi Shlomi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Check:
http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/grad-fu/1-3-x.html
for a link to the up-to-date patch.
Thanks for the patch. Would you mind attaching this to the bug report,
just in case your hard-drive fries over the holidays or something?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
[E
Manish Singh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project.
But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the intent from the beginning.
I don't see how "incubation" helps it in any way. There are people who
have ind
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to
move it into the GIMP source tree if it was started as a separate
pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
