Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Alternative zoom algorithm

2004-01-20 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:13:19AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes. True.

[Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Alternative zoom algorithm

2004-01-20 Thread Carol Spears
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:13:19AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it just fits

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Alternative zoom algorithm

2004-01-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
I've tried Simons Patch, and it seemed very nice for me. Of course I am innoi position to word out what should and should not be commited, but from a user point of view, it is nice. Unfortunately I could not check GSR's patch because of compiling issues. Regards, JS -- On

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Alternative zoom algorithm

2004-01-20 Thread pcg
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the bulk of the code in gimp that causes warnings is stuff like: void foo (void **p); void bar (void) { int *i; foo ((void **) i); } While it does break the letter of the law wrt aliasing rules,

RE: [Gimp-developer] Dithering

2004-01-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
That's because the screen display code doesn't smooth the image when it scales it, for speed reasons. Dedicated viewing programs can afford to do a better job showing the image because they won't be re-drawing it quite so often (imaging panning around the image while editing it - you'd like that

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dithering

2004-01-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's because the screen display code doesn't smooth the image when it scales it, for speed reasons. Dedicated viewing programs can afford to do a better job showing the image because they won't be re-drawing it quite so often (imaging panning

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Alternative zoom algorithm

2004-01-20 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the bulk of the code in gimp that causes warnings is stuff like: void foo (void **p); void bar (void) { int *i; foo ((void

[Gimp-developer] gimp-data-extras update

2004-01-20 Thread Dave Neary
Hi all, I was a little bored after lunch, so I updated the configure.in of gimp-data-extras to work with the 1.3 releases. For those who want to install these with an old 1.2 gimp, the branch gimp-1-2 was created. To get the extra brushes, patterns and gradients that were collected all those