Steve Stavropoulos wrote:
On 11/19/05, Dag Rune Sneeggen wrote:
John Leach wrote:
Looking at the original, I can see what it's accentuating but it looks
bad. Other photos look great, much sharper compared with the cubic
algorithm. This seems rather too sharp, in the wrong place.
But
Hi,
John Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just downloaded the 2.3.5 snapshot and had a go with the Lanczos
resizing algorithm. It seems to bring out some strange artifacts in
one photo (actually, the first I randomly tried).
The Lanczos implementation in CVS is buggy and unless someone
Hi,
Tim E. Jedlicka - wrk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could be an interesting trivia item - the shortest interval from
Open to Fixed.
Look for example at bug #321855. It was fixed three days before it
even has been reported ;)
Sven
___
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
John Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just downloaded the 2.3.5 snapshot and had a go with the Lanczos
resizing algorithm. It seems to bring out some strange artifacts in
one photo (actually, the first I randomly tried).
The Lanczos implementation in CVS is
