On 8/26/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/26/06, Sven Neumann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:01 +0930, David Gowers wrote:> Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink> tool?Should be a simple change, just turn off supersampling in th
On 8/26/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:01 +0930, David Gowers wrote:> Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink> tool?Should be a simple change, just turn off supersampling in the ink code.
Ah, the #define SUBSAMPLE 8 line. Changin
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:01 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink
> tool?
Should be a simple change, just turn off supersampling in the ink code.
> I find the hard edged rendering used in INDEXED mode best for drawing
> lineart, bu
I have an image. And I want to have two 'views' of the image -- not in the sense that gimp uses the word 'view', but I want an RGB version and Indexed version. I wrote a plugin to do this; if it detects a first time run (ie. no alternate views exist), it duplicates the image, converts it to GRAY mo
Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink tool? I find the hard edged rendering used in INDEXED mode best for drawing lineart, but dislike the other constraints (no drawing modes/opacity/layer modes) imposed by working in INDEXED mode. So far, I've tried to find the part
